• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

股骨头骨骺滑脱模型中螺钉固定与克氏针固定的生物力学分析

Biomechanical analysis of screw fixation vs. K-wire fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis model.

作者信息

Druschel Claudia, Sawicki Olga, Cip Johannes, Schmölz Werner, Funk Julia F, Placzek Richard

机构信息

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Campus Virchow, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2012 May 30;57(3):157-62. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0127.

DOI:10.1515/bmt-2011-0127
PMID:22691422
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous data have shown that due to the technical ease, low-morbidity, and lower complication rates, the in situ single-implant fixation is the current standard for stabilization of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) fixation. Multiple-implant fixation is thought to be combined with a higher incidence of serious complications. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate single- vs. multiple-implant fixation regarding strength and stiffness. Furthermore, different screw designs, including telescopic screw, were evaluated regarding the stiffness, strength, and especially fixation failure.

METHODS

Forty porcine proximal femurs were sectioned through the physeal line using a gigli saw and stabilized with a 7.3-mm stainless steel AO screw, a dynamic telescopic screw, three 1.6-mm Kirschner wires (K-wires), and three 2.0-mm K-wires. The femurs were biomechanically tested to determine failure load (N) and stiffness (N/mm).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found regarding failure load and stiffness between the two screw groups. The 2.0-mm K-wire construct was significantly the strongest and stiffest fixation. The 1.6-mm K-wire fixation had the lowest values, but not statistically significant. Regarding the fixation failure, no femoral shaft fracture occurred.

CONCLUSION

SCFE stabilization with three 2.0-mm K-wires leads to increased stability over single-screw fixation and 1.6-mm K-wire fixation. However, none of the two screws seemed to be superior in fixation stability and fixation failure.

摘要

引言

先前的数据表明,由于技术操作简便、发病率低且并发症发生率较低,原位单植入物固定是目前稳定股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)固定的标准方法。多植入物固定被认为会伴有更高的严重并发症发生率。本研究的目的是评估单植入物与多植入物固定在强度和刚度方面的差异。此外,还评估了不同的螺钉设计,包括伸缩式螺钉,在刚度、强度,尤其是固定失败方面的情况。

方法

使用线锯通过骨骺线将40根猪的近端股骨切开,并用一根7.3毫米不锈钢AO螺钉、一根动态伸缩式螺钉、三根1.6毫米克氏针(K针)和三根2.0毫米K针进行固定。对股骨进行生物力学测试以确定破坏载荷(N)和刚度(N/mm)。

结果

两组螺钉在破坏载荷和刚度方面未发现显著差异。2.0毫米K针结构是最坚固和最具刚性的固定方式。1.6毫米K针固定的值最低,但无统计学意义。关于固定失败,未发生股骨干骨折。

结论

用三根2.0毫米K针进行SCFE固定比单螺钉固定和1.6毫米K针固定具有更高的稳定性。然而,两种螺钉在固定稳定性和固定失败方面似乎都不具有优势。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical analysis of screw fixation vs. K-wire fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis model.股骨头骨骺滑脱模型中螺钉固定与克氏针固定的生物力学分析
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2012 May 30;57(3):157-62. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0127.
2
Biomechanical stability of single-screw versus two-screw fixation of an unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis model: effect of screw position in the femoral neck.不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱模型中单螺钉与双螺钉固定的生物力学稳定性:螺钉在股骨颈位置的影响
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):601-5. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000230328.06460.be.
3
[Growth and deformity after in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis].[股骨头骨骺滑脱原位固定后的生长与畸形]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2013 Aug;151(4):371-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1350667. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
4
Biomechanical analysis of single screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: are more threads across the physis necessary for stability?儿童股骨头骨骺滑脱单螺钉固定的生物力学分析:跨越骨骺的螺纹更多是否对稳定性更有必要?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(4):474-8. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000217732.24041.81.
5
Torsional strength of double- versus single-screw fixation in a pig model of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.在不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱猪模型中双螺钉与单螺钉固定的扭转强度
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):295-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000214906.70045.78.
6
Biomechanical comparison of fully and partially threaded screws for fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.用于固定股骨头骨骺滑脱的全螺纹和半螺纹螺钉的生物力学比较。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):49-52. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31815a5fa4.
7
Biomechanical study of 16-mm threaded, 32-mm threaded, and fully threaded SCFE screw fixation.16毫米螺纹、32毫米螺纹及全螺纹型股骨头骺滑脱螺钉内固定的生物力学研究
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):70-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31823b18dd.
8
Significantly lower femoral neck growth in screw fixation of the asymptomatic contralateral hip in unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.单侧股骨头骨骺滑脱患者无症状对侧髋关节螺钉固定时股骨颈生长明显较低。
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016 May;25(3):197-201. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000285.
9
Biomechanical Comparison of Perpendicular Versus Oblique In Situ Screw Fixation of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.股骨颈滑脱垂直与斜向原位螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Dec;35(8):816-20. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000379.
10
Biomechanical Testing of Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Screw Fixation: Worth the Risk of a Second Screw?不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱螺钉固定的生物力学测试:值得承担第二枚螺钉的风险吗?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5):496-500. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000311.

引用本文的文献

1
[Treatment of chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Use of dynamic epiphyseal telescopic screws].[儿童股骨头骨骺慢性滑脱的治疗:动力性骨骺伸缩螺钉的应用]
Orthopade. 2016 Jul;45(7):597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3266-5.