Jensen-Doss Amanda, Cusack Karen J, de Arellano Michael A
Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, 4225 TAMU, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2008 Aug;44(4):227-44. doi: 10.1007/s10597-007-9121-8. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
Despite evidence that more intensive methods are more effective, many clinical settings continue to train practitioners using workshops. To more fully understand the strengths and limitations of workshops, the present investigation studied changes in practitioner behavior following a workshop in trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapy (TF-CBT). A chart review indicated no changes in TF-CBT use following the training, although therapists indicated that CBT was the most effective treatment for traumatized youths and was their primary approach to treating trauma. Analysis of client factors indicated weak relationships between technique use and treatment need. Implications of these findings for future training efforts are discussed.
尽管有证据表明更强化的方法更有效，但许多临床机构仍通过研讨会来培训从业者。为了更全面地了解研讨会的优势和局限性，本研究调查了创伤聚焦认知行为疗法（TF-CBT）研讨会后从业者行为的变化。一项图表审查表明，培训后TF-CBT的使用没有变化，尽管治疗师表示认知行为疗法是治疗受创伤青少年最有效的方法，也是他们治疗创伤的主要方法。对客户因素的分析表明，技术使用与治疗需求之间的关系较弱。本文讨论了这些发现对未来培训工作的启示。
