• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饱和前列腺穿刺活检以及初次和重复评估时的前列腺癌检测

Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation.

作者信息

Pepe Pietro, Aragona Francesco

机构信息

Urology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.068.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.068
PMID:18158033
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients who underwent a saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx) as primary biopsy or in case of rebiopsy.

METHODS

We assessed 189 patients (median age 60.3 years) submitted to a transrectal ultrasound-guided SPBx (range, 24 to 37 cores; median, 29). In 98 men the SPBx was performed as the primary procedure, in 75 as the second, and in 16 as the third biopsy set. Indications for biopsy were: abnormal DRE; total prostate specific antigen (PSA) (tPSA) greater than 10 ng/mL; tPSA equal to 4 to 10, 2.6 to 3.9, less than or equal to 2.5 ng/mL; and percent free PSA (%-fPSA) 25% or less, 20% or less, and 15% or less, respectively. The PCa detection using an SPBx as initial biopsy was compared retrospectively with that found in 256 and 116 patients who underwent 12- and 18-core biopsy, respectively, according to the same protocol. The results obtained in 75 patients submitted to an SPBx as the second biopsy set were compared retrospectively with those found in 73 men who underwent an 18-core re-biopsy.

RESULTS

The PCa detection rate with SPBx as primary biopsy was 46.9%, greater than the 12-core biopsy (39.8%; P = 0.3) but lower than the 18-core biopsy (49%; P = 0.6). In the case of second and third biopsy, the incidence of PCa when using an SPBx compared with 18-core biopsy was 22% versus 10.9% (P = 0.003) and 6.2% versus 0%, respectively. The incidence of neoplastic microfoci was 34.7% at first and 45.5% at second biopsy set. In all patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy with a bioptic diagnosis of neoplastic microfocus, the pTNM revealed a clinically significant cancer (tumor volume greater than 0.5 mL or Gleason score of 6 or higher).

CONCLUSIONS

As primary biopsy, SPBx does not increase the PCa detection rate compared with an 18-core scheme; in the case of rebiopsy, the SPBx is a recommended method as the PCa detection rate is doubled compared with 12- or 18-core biopsy sets.

摘要

目的

评估接受饱和前列腺穿刺活检(SPBx)作为初次活检或再次活检的患者中前列腺癌(PCa)的发生率。

方法

我们评估了189例患者(中位年龄60.3岁),他们接受了经直肠超声引导下的SPBx(穿刺针数范围为24至37针;中位针数为29针)。98例男性患者中,SPBx作为初次操作进行;75例作为第二次操作;16例作为第三次活检。活检指征包括:直肠指检异常;总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)大于10 ng/mL;tPSA等于4至10 ng/mL、2.6至3.9 ng/mL、小于或等于2.5 ng/mL;游离PSA百分比(%-fPSA)分别为25%或更低、20%或更低、15%或更低。将以SPBx作为初次活检的PCa检出率与分别按照相同方案接受12针和18针活检的256例和116例患者的检出率进行回顾性比较。将75例接受SPBx作为第二次活检的患者的结果与73例接受18针再次活检的男性患者的结果进行回顾性比较。

结果

以SPBx作为初次活检时,PCa检出率为46.9%,高于12针活检(39.8%;P = 0.3)但低于18针活检(49%;P = 0.6)。在第二次和第三次活检的情况下,与18针活检相比,使用SPBx时PCa的发生率分别为22%对10.9%(P = 0.003)和6.2%对0%。初次活检时肿瘤微灶的发生率为34.7%,第二次活检时为45.5%。在所有经活检诊断为肿瘤微灶并接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者中,pTNM显示为临床显著癌(肿瘤体积大于0.5 mL或Gleason评分6分或更高)。

结论

作为初次活检,与18针方案相比,SPBx并未提高PCa检出率;在再次活检的情况下,SPBx是一种推荐方法,因为与12针或18针活检相比,其PCa检出率提高了一倍。

相似文献

1
Saturation prostate needle biopsy and prostate cancer detection at initial and repeat evaluation.饱和前列腺穿刺活检以及初次和重复评估时的前列腺癌检测
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1131-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.068.
2
Is quantitative histologic examination useful to predict nonorgan-confined prostate cancer when saturation biopsy is performed?当进行饱和活检时,定量组织学检查对预测非器官局限性前列腺癌是否有用?
Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.045.
3
Is a single focus of low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed on saturation biopsy predictive of clinically insignificant cancer?在饱和活检中诊断出的单一低级别前列腺癌病灶能否预测临床意义不显著的癌症?
Urol Int. 2010;84(4):440-4. doi: 10.1159/000296293. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
4
Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.前列腺活检:对象、方法及时机。最新进展。
Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:44-8; discussion 99-100.
5
Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during followup after initial prostate biopsy.饱和技术在初次前列腺活检后的随访期间不会降低癌症检测率。
J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1746-50; discussion 1750. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.049. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
6
The incidence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma on first-time saturation needle biopsy, and the subsequent risk of cancer.初次饱和穿刺活检时高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变及可疑癌的非典型腺泡的发生率,以及后续的癌症风险。
BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):770-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06728.x. Epub 2007 Jan 16.
7
Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle biopsy.重复进行21针扩展穿刺活检患者的前列腺癌检测率
Eur Urol. 2009 Mar;55(3):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.043. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
8
Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients.用于连续1000例患者前列腺癌诊断的扩展21样本针吸活检方案
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.02.062. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
9
Percent free PSA as an additional measure in a prostate cancer screen.游离前列腺特异抗原百分比作为前列腺癌筛查的一项附加指标。
Clin Lab Sci. 2001 Spring;14(2):102-7.
10
Role of transperineal six-core prostate biopsy in patients with prostate-specific antigen level greater than 10 ng/mL and abnormal digital rectal examination findings.经会阴六核心前列腺活检在前列腺特异性抗原水平大于10 ng/mL且直肠指检结果异常患者中的作用。
Urology. 2006 Mar;67(3):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.036.

引用本文的文献

1
Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy for cancer detection in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen: a multicenter, real-world study.经直肠与经会阴前列腺活检在灰区前列腺特异性抗原患者中用于癌症检测的比较:一项多中心、真实世界研究。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):377-381. doi: 10.4103/aja20241. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Ultrasound/MRI-targeted biopsy versus saturated trans-rectal ultrasound guided biopsy of prostate in patients with primary negative conventional biopsy and still elevated PSA: a prospective randomized clinical trial.对于初次常规活检结果为阴性但前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)仍升高的患者,超声/磁共振成像(MRI)引导下靶向活检与饱和经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2023 Aug 15;11(4):312-319. eCollection 2023.
3
Using deep learning to detect patients at risk for prostate cancer despite benign biopsies.利用深度学习检测活检结果为良性但有前列腺癌风险的患者。
iScience. 2022 Jun 23;25(7):104663. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104663. eCollection 2022 Jul 15.
4
A New Framework for Precise Identification of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.一种前列腺腺癌精准识别的新框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 26;22(5):1848. doi: 10.3390/s22051848.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Hydrogel Spacer Injection Space OAR in Men Submitted to Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌适形分割放疗中应用水凝胶 spacer 注射间隙保护器官的临床结果
In Vivo. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):3385-3389. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12637.
6
The Specific Choice of Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy Scheme Based on Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Specific Antigen Density.基于前列腺特异抗原和前列腺特异抗原密度的经直肠超声引导前列腺活检方案的具体选择。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Aug 19;25:6230-6235. doi: 10.12659/MSM.915826.
7
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted biopsy in risk classification among patients on active surveillance: A diagnostic meta-analysis.磁共振成像引导下的靶向活检在接受主动监测患者风险分类中的应用:一项诊断性荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16122. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016122.
8
Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate rebiopsy: How many core sampling should be applied to which patient?经直肠超声引导下的前列腺再次活检:对于不同患者应采用多少针穿刺取样?
Urol Ann. 2018 Jan-Mar;10(1):15-19. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_110_17.
9
Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.联合超声/磁共振多参数融合引导活检与系统性超声活检获得的组织学结果分析:磁共振多参数成像在前列腺癌检测及假阴性中的作用
Radiol Med. 2018 Feb;123(2):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0814-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Preliminary study on ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy specimen scores.超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检标本评分的初步研究
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Sep;14(3):2619-2624. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4800. Epub 2017 Jul 18.