Gatward J J, Thomas M J C, Nolan J P, Cook T M
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Mar;100(3):351-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem364. Epub 2007 Dec 24.
Resuscitation guidelines recommend that chest compressions should continue throughout attempts to place airway devices. Few data support the use of the tracheal tube over supraglottic airway devices (SADs) during cardiopulmonary arrest. This study was designed to evaluate the speed with which different airway devices could be placed with and without interrupting chest compressions.
Forty volunteer doctors regularly involved in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were timed inserting four different airway devices [tracheal tube (TT), LMA Classic (cLMA), LMA ProSeal (PLMA), and igel] into a manikin, with and without stopping chest compressions.
Chest compressions delayed the placement of the TT only (3.3 s, P<0.0001). Comparison of the speed of insertion of the different airway devices during CPR enabled ranking of the devices: igel (fastest), PLMA (second), and TT and cLMA (joint slowest). The igel was inserted approximately 50% faster than the other devices. Doctors who had previously inserted more than 50 tracheal tubes were significantly faster at intubating the trachea, but no faster at inserting SADs.
Our results show that continuing chest compressions has a minor effect on time for tracheal intubation and until clear human data are available the recommendation to intubate without interrupting CPR is therefore justified. The PLMA and igel (SADs with a gastric drain tube) were both faster to insert than the cLMA and offer additional benefits. They should be considered for use in CPR.
复苏指南建议,在尝试放置气道装置的整个过程中应持续进行胸外按压。几乎没有数据支持在心肺骤停期间使用气管导管优于声门上气道装置(SADs)。本研究旨在评估在不中断胸外按压和中断胸外按压的情况下放置不同气道装置的速度。
对40名经常参与心肺复苏(CPR)的志愿医生进行计时,他们在人体模型上插入四种不同的气道装置[气管导管(TT)、LMA Classic(cLMA)、LMA ProSeal(PLMA)和igel],分为不停止胸外按压和停止胸外按压两种情况。
胸外按压仅延迟了气管导管的放置(3.3秒,P<0.0001)。比较心肺复苏期间不同气道装置的插入速度,可对这些装置进行排序:igel(最快)、PLMA(第二)、TT和cLMA(并列最慢)。igel的插入速度比其他装置快约50%。之前插入过50根以上气管导管的医生气管插管速度明显更快,但插入声门上气道装置时速度并不更快。
我们的结果表明,持续胸外按压对气管插管时间影响较小,因此在尚无明确的人体数据之前,不中断心肺复苏进行插管的建议是合理的。PLMA和igel(带有胃引流管的声门上气道装置)的插入速度均比cLMA快,且具有额外优势。在心肺复苏中应考虑使用它们。