EMS, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Emerg Med J. 2010 Nov;27(11):860-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.084343. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
Control of the airway is a priority during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and/or following a failed intubation attempt. Supraglottic airway devices provide more effective airway management than bag-valve-mask-ventilation (BVMV) and can be effectively used by non-anaesthetists.
36 paramedic students were timed to ascertain how long it took them to place an Igel, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or laryngeal tube airway (LTA) into a manikin. Following insertion, students were interviewed to see which device they preferred and why.
The Igel was consistently the fastest airway device, taking a mean of 12.3 s (95% CI 11.5 to 13.1) to insert, the LTA took a mean time of 22.4 s (95% CI 20.3 to 24.5) and the LMA 33.8 s (95% CI 30.9 to 36.7). 63% of students would choose the Igel as their preferred intermediate airway device, stating ease of use and speed of insertion as the primary reasons.
The ease and speed at which a supraglottic airway can be inserted means that it is a viable alternative to the use of the BVMV.
心肺复苏期间或插管失败后,气道控制是首要任务。相较于球囊-面罩通气(BVMV),声门上气道装置可提供更有效的气道管理,且非麻醉师也能有效使用。
36 名护理学生需要在模型上放置 Igel、喉罩气道(LMA)或喉管气道(LTA),并记录所需时间。插入后,学生们被问到他们更喜欢哪种装置以及原因。
Igel 始终是最快的气道装置,平均插入时间为 12.3 秒(95%CI 11.5 至 13.1),LTA 平均插入时间为 22.4 秒(95%CI 20.3 至 24.5),LMA 为 33.8 秒(95%CI 30.9 至 36.7)。63%的学生将 Igel 作为首选的中级气道装置,他们表示易于使用和快速插入是主要原因。
声门上气道装置能够轻松快速插入,这意味着它是替代 BVMV 的可行选择。