Suppr超能文献

使联盟发挥作用的简单规则。

Simple rules for making alliances work.

作者信息

Hughes Jonathan, Weiss Jeff

机构信息

Vantage Partners, Boston-Based Management Consulting Firm, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 2007 Nov;85(11):122-6, 128, 130-1 passim.

Abstract

Corporate alliances are growing in number--by about 25% a year--and account for up to a third of revenues and value at many companies. Yet some 60% to 70% of them fail. What is going wrong? Because alliances involve interdependence between companies that may be competitors and may also have vastly different operating styles and cultures, they demand more care and handling than other business arrangements, say Hughes and Weiss, management consultants at Vantage Partners. The authors have developed five principles--based on their two decades of work with alliances -to complement the conventional advice on alliance management: (1) Focus less on defining the business plan and more on how you and your partner will work together. (2) Develop metrics pegged not only to alliance goals but also to performance in working toward them. (3) Instead of trying to eliminate differences, leverage them to create value. (4) Go beyond formal systems and structures to enable and encourage collaborative behavior. (5) Be as diligent in managing your internal stakeholders as you are in managing the relationship with your partner. Companies that have adopted these principles have radically improved their alliance success rate. Schering-Plough, for example, engages in a systematic "alliance relationship launch": four to six weeks of meetings at which the partners explore potential challenges, examine key differences and develop shared protocols for managing them, and establish mechanisms for day-to-day decision making. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida measures the quality of alliance progress through regular surveys of both its own staff and its partners'. These companies have learned that the conventional advice is not so much wrong as incomplete. The five simple rules can help fill in the blanks.

摘要

企业联盟的数量正在逐年增加,增幅约为25%,在许多公司的营收和价值中占比高达三分之一。然而,其中约60%到70%的联盟都失败了。问题出在哪里呢?Vantage Partners管理顾问休斯和韦斯表示,由于联盟涉及到可能是竞争对手且运营风格和文化可能大相径庭的公司之间的相互依存关系,所以它们比其他商业安排需要更多的关注和处理。基于他们在联盟方面二十年的工作经验,作者制定了五条原则,以补充联盟管理方面的传统建议:(1)少关注业务计划的定义,多关注你和你的合作伙伴将如何合作。(2)制定不仅与联盟目标挂钩,还与实现这些目标的绩效挂钩的指标。(3)不要试图消除差异,而是利用它们创造价值。(4)超越正式的系统和结构,以促进和鼓励协作行为。(5)在管理内部利益相关者时要像管理与合作伙伴的关系一样勤勉。采用这些原则的公司已经大幅提高了它们联盟的成功率。例如,先灵葆雅公司进行系统的“联盟关系启动”:为期四到六周的会议,合作伙伴在会上探讨潜在挑战、审视关键差异并制定管理这些差异的共享协议,以及建立日常决策机制。佛罗里达州蓝十字蓝盾公司通过定期调查自己的员工和合作伙伴来衡量联盟进展的质量。这些公司已经认识到,传统建议并非完全错误,而是不完整。这五条简单规则有助于填补空白。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验