Bresadola Marco
Dipartimento di Scienze Umane, Università di Ferrara, Via Savonarola 38, 44100 Ferrara-Italy.
J Hist Neurosci. 2008;17(1):8-32. doi: 10.1080/09647040600764787.
In the 1790s, Luigi Galvani and Alessandro Volta were the main protagonists of a lively debate on the role of electricity in animal organisms. Significant developments originated from this debate, leading to the foundation of two new disciplines, electrodynamics and electrophysiology, that were to play a crucial role in the scientific and technological progress of the last two centuries. The Galvani-Volta controversy has been repeatedly reconstructed, sometimes in an attempt to identify the merits and the errors of one or the other of the two protagonists, sometimes with the aim of demonstrating that the theories elaborated by the two Italian scholars were irreconcilable, reflecting completely different ways of looking at phenomena and conceiving of scientific research. In this article a different interpretation is offered, based on a discussion of the scientific issues that were central to Galvani's and Volta's research, and with reference to the context of science and society of the eighteenth century.
18世纪90年代,路易吉·伽伐尼和亚历山德罗·伏特是一场关于电在动物机体中作用的激烈辩论的主要参与者。这场辩论催生了重大进展,促成了两门新学科——电动力学和电生理学的创立,这两门学科在过去两个世纪的科技进步中发挥了关键作用。伽伐尼与伏特之间的争论已被多次重构,有时是为了辨别两位主角各自的优点与错误,有时是为了证明这两位意大利学者所阐述的理论不可调和,反映出看待现象和构思科学研究的全然不同的方式。在本文中,基于对伽伐尼和伏特研究核心的科学问题的讨论,并参考18世纪的科学与社会背景,提出了一种不同的解读。