Dagenais Simon, Caro Jaime, Haldeman Scott
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Spine J. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):8-20. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.10.005.
The economic burden of low back pain (LBP) is very large and appears to be growing. It is not possible to impact this burden without understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the research on which these costs are calculated.
To conduct a systematic review of LBP cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review of the literature.
Medline was searched to uncover studies about the direct or indirect costs of LBP published in English from 1997 to 2007. Data extracted for each eligible study included study design, population, definition of LBP, methods of estimating costs, year of data, and estimates of direct, indirect, or total costs. Results were synthesized descriptively.
The search yielded 147 studies, of which 21 were deemed relevant; 4 other studies and 2 additional abstracts were found by searching reference lists, bringing the total to 27 relevant studies. The studies reported on data from Australia, Belgium, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the United States. Nine studies estimated direct costs only, nine indirect costs only, and nine both direct and indirect costs, from a societal (n=18) or private insurer (n=9) perspective. Methodology used to derive both direct and indirect cost estimates differed markedly among the studies. Among studies providing a breakdown on direct costs, the largest proportion of direct medical costs for LBP was spent on physical therapy (17%) and inpatient services (17%), followed by pharmacy (13%) and primary care (13%). Among studies providing estimates of total costs, indirect costs resulting from lost work productivity represented a majority of overall costs associated with LBP. Three studies reported that estimates with the friction period approach were 56% lower than with the human capital approach.
Several studies have attempted to estimate the direct, indirect, or total costs associated with LBP in various countries using heterogeneous methodology. Estimates of the economic costs in different countries vary greatly depending on study methodology but by any standards must be considered a substantial burden on society. This review did not identify any studies estimating the total costs of LBP in the United States from a societal perspective. Such studies may be helpful in determining appropriate allocation of health-care resources devoted to this condition.
腰痛(LBP)的经济负担非常大,且似乎在不断增加。如果不了解计算这些成本所依据研究的优缺点,就无法对这一负担产生影响。
对美国及国际上关于LBP疾病成本的研究进行系统综述。
研究设计/设置:对文献进行系统综述。
检索Medline以查找1997年至2007年以英文发表的关于LBP直接或间接成本的研究。为每项符合条件的研究提取的数据包括研究设计、人群、LBP的定义、成本估算方法、数据年份以及直接、间接或总成本估算。结果进行描述性综合分析。
检索得到147项研究,其中21项被认为相关;通过检索参考文献列表又发现4项其他研究和2篇额外摘要,使相关研究总数达到27项。这些研究报告了来自澳大利亚、比利时、日本、韩国、荷兰、瑞典、英国和美国的数据。9项研究仅估算直接成本,9项仅估算间接成本,9项同时估算直接和间接成本,分别从社会(n = 18)或私人保险公司(n = 9)的角度。研究中用于得出直接和间接成本估算的方法差异显著。在提供直接成本明细的研究中,LBP直接医疗成本的最大比例用于物理治疗(17%)和住院服务(17%),其次是药房(13%)和初级保健(13%)。在提供总成本估算的研究中,因工作生产力损失导致的间接成本占LBP相关总成本的大部分。三项研究报告称,采用摩擦期方法的估算比采用人力资本方法的估算低56%。
多项研究试图使用不同方法估算不同国家与LBP相关的直接、间接或总成本。不同国家的经济成本估算因研究方法而异,但无论按照何种标准,都必须被视为对社会的沉重负担。本综述未发现从社会角度估算美国LBP总成本的任何研究。此类研究可能有助于确定用于这种疾病的医疗保健资源的适当分配。