Shafer Brian L, Mihata Teruhisa, McGarry Michelle H, Tibone James E, Lee Thay Q
University of Southern California, Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, 1510 San Pablo Street, Suite 322, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):136-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00841.
Arthroscopic treatment of multidirectional shoulder instability with use of capsular plication and rotator interval closure has been shown to be effective in several clinical studies; however, the biomechanical effects of these procedures have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess biomechanically the effect of arthroscopic capsular plication combined with rotator interval closure on rotational range of motion, humeral head position throughout rotation, and glenohumeral translation.
Seven cadaveric shoulders were stretched to 10% beyond the maximum range of motion in 60 degrees and 0 degrees of glenohumeral abduction. Testing was performed for the intact and stretched conditions and following three sequential capsular repairs: anterior plication, posterior plication, and rotator interval closure. Rotational range of motion, humeral head position throughout the range of motion, and glenohumeral translations were measured in both positions.
Stretching increased the total rotational range of motion in 60 degrees and 0 degrees of abduction. After anterior plication alone, total rotation decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in both positions and was restored to the intact state. Total translation with a 20-N load increased significantly in the 60 degrees of abduction position after stretching (p = 0.03). Anterior-posterior translation decreased significantly compared with the stretched state only after all components of the repair were completed in 60 degrees of abduction (p = 0.0003 with a 15-N load and p = 0.0001 with a 20-N load). This decrease was also found to be significantly less than the intact condition (p = 0.008 with a 15-N load and p = 0.001 with a 20-N load). A similar trend in results was found with superior-inferior translations in the 0 degrees of abduction position.
Capsular plication alone reduces range of motion to the intact state. Reductions in translation, however, may require the addition of rotator interval closure. Changes in translation and rotation after repair are dependent on arm position. In some positions, the addition of rotator interval closure may also result in overtightening.
多项临床研究表明,采用关节囊折叠术和旋转间隙闭合术对多向性肩关节不稳定进行关节镜治疗是有效的;然而,这些手术的生物力学效应尚未阐明。本研究的目的是从生物力学角度评估关节镜下关节囊折叠术联合旋转间隙闭合术对旋转活动范围、整个旋转过程中肱骨头位置以及盂肱关节平移的影响。
七具尸体肩关节在盂肱关节外展60度和0度时被拉伸至超出最大活动范围10%。对完整状态和拉伸状态以及以下三种连续的关节囊修复术后进行测试:前侧折叠术、后侧折叠术和旋转间隙闭合术。在两个位置测量旋转活动范围、整个活动范围内的肱骨头位置以及盂肱关节平移。
拉伸增加了外展60度和0度时的总旋转活动范围。仅在前侧折叠术后,两个位置的总旋转均显著降低(p < 0.05),并恢复到完整状态。在60度外展位置,拉伸后施加20 N负荷时的总平移显著增加(p = 0.03)。仅在60度外展时完成所有修复组件后,与拉伸状态相比,前后平移显著降低(15 N负荷时p = 0.0003,20 N负荷时p = 0.0001)。还发现这种降低显著小于完整状态(15 N负荷时p = 0.008,20 N负荷时p = 0.001)。在0度外展位置的上下平移中也发现了类似的结果趋势。
单独的关节囊折叠术可将活动范围恢复到完整状态。然而,平移的减少可能需要增加旋转间隙闭合术。修复后平移和旋转的变化取决于手臂位置。在某些位置,增加旋转间隙闭合术也可能导致过度收紧。