Beger Maria, McKenna Sheila A, Possingham Hugh P
The Ecology Centre, The School of Integrative Biology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2007 Dec;21(6):1584-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00795.x.
Implementing systematically designed reserve systems is crucial to slowing the global decline of coral reef health and diversity. Yet, the paucity of spatial data for most coral reef taxa often requires conservation planners to design reserve systems based only on a subset of taxonomic groups as surrogates for all other taxa. In terrestrial systems the validity of surrogates for reserve design is established by testing for cross-taxon congruence (similarities in spatial patterns of species richness), but this concept has rarely been examined in the marine environment. We tested the suitability of taxa as conservation representation surrogates of coral reef species richness across the Indo-Pacific, based on species lists of fishes, corals, and mollusks from 167 sites. First, we tested the relevance of cross-taxon congruence patterns to predict these surrogacy patterns. We determined congruence between taxonomic groups by conducting a correlation analysis of dissimilarity values between pairs of sites. We then evaluated how well each taxonomic group represented the other groups in a marine reserve system selected by a greedy reserve-selection algorithm relative to reserve systems selected by chance. No taxonomic group we examined was a reliable surrogate for the other groups such that site selection based on that group always represented other taxa significantly better than random selection of sites. Sites selected based on hard corals represented the other taxonomic groups in a reserve system worse than randomly selected sites. Although we found high cross-taxon congruence between fishes and corals and between corals and mollusks, for some regions cross-taxon congruence was not always a reliable indicator of the ability of one taxonomic group to efficiently represent another in a reserve system. We concluded that in Indo-Pacific coral reef ecosystems one can only be sure that a target taxon is efficiently represented in a reserve system when data on that taxon are used to select a reserve system.
系统地实施设计好的保护区系统对于减缓全球珊瑚礁健康状况和生物多样性的下降至关重要。然而,大多数珊瑚礁分类群的空间数据匮乏,这常常要求保护规划者仅基于部分分类群来设计保护区系统,以此作为所有其他分类群的替代。在陆地系统中,通过测试跨分类群一致性(物种丰富度空间格局的相似性)来确定保护区设计替代物的有效性,但这一概念在海洋环境中很少被研究。我们基于来自167个地点的鱼类、珊瑚和软体动物的物种清单,测试了各分类群作为印度 - 太平洋地区珊瑚礁物种丰富度保护代表性替代物的适用性。首先,我们测试了跨分类群一致性模式预测这些替代模式的相关性。我们通过对成对地点之间的差异值进行相关分析来确定分类群之间的一致性。然后,我们评估了在由贪婪保护区选择算法选择的海洋保护区系统中,相对于随机选择的保护区系统,每个分类群在多大程度上能代表其他分类群。我们研究的分类群中没有一个是其他分类群的可靠替代物,以至于基于该分类群的地点选择总是比随机选择地点能显著更好地代表其他分类群。基于硬珊瑚选择的地点在保护区系统中代表其他分类群的情况比随机选择的地点更差。尽管我们发现鱼类与珊瑚之间以及珊瑚与软体动物之间存在高度的跨分类群一致性,但在某些地区,跨分类群一致性并不总是一个可靠的指标,用以表明一个分类群在保护区系统中有效代表另一个分类群的能力。我们得出结论,在印度 - 太平洋珊瑚礁生态系统中,只有当使用目标分类群的数据来选择保护区系统时,才能确保该目标分类群在保护区系统中得到有效代表。