• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸烟者戒烟动机与人群层面烟草控制强度之间的关系:五个欧洲国家的比较

The relationship between smokers' motivation to quit and intensity of tobacco control at the population level: a comparison of five European countries.

作者信息

Thyrian Jochen René, Panagiotakos Demosthenes B, Polychronopoulos Evangelos, West Robert, Zatonski Witold, John Ulrich

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Str, 48, 17489 Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 3;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-2.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-8-2
PMID:18173845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2245926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smoking prevalence differs significantly across Europe. In addition, there are considerable differences in tobacco control activities across European countries. The relationship between prevalence and policy is under-researched. The present analysis examines the motivation to change smoking behaviour across 5 different European countries that differ considerably in their tobacco control activities.

METHODS

A population-based, representative survey of 1750 smokers, aged 16-59, from 5 different European countries (Germany, Greece, Poland, Sweden, UK) was used. Demographic variables, smoking status and the motivation to stop smoking were assessed. Motivation was assessed as, first, intending to quit (using the stages of change plus a modified stage for Precontemplation), and second, the desire to quit.

RESULTS

The majority of smokers want to stop smoking (73.5%), while only 35.0% want to stop definitely. Across countries, 10.2% definitely do not want to stop. Most of the smokers can be categorised in the Precontemplation stage (between 62.6% and 77.7% depending on the country), one of the stages of change categories. The relationship between the stages of change and the country under examination is statistically significant (chi-square = 43.466, p < 0.001). In countries with a high level of tobacco control, the proportion of people in Precontemplation is lower than in countries with low tobacco control activity.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the stages of change between the countries under examination. However, the categorisation of the countries into low, medium and high tobacco control activity used in this analysis does not explain these differences. Most smokers want to stop smoking, but a high proportion cannot indicate a time-frame when this is going to happen. Tobacco control efforts or other kinds of support might encourage these smokers to actually try to stop. Longitudinal studies at the population level are needed to assess, relate or monitor tobacco control activities and the intention to stop.

摘要

背景

吸烟率在欧洲各国存在显著差异。此外,欧洲各国在烟草控制活动方面也存在相当大的差异。吸烟率与政策之间的关系研究不足。本分析考察了5个不同欧洲国家吸烟行为改变的动机,这些国家在烟草控制活动方面差异很大。

方法

对来自5个不同欧洲国家(德国、希腊、波兰、瑞典、英国)的1750名年龄在16 - 59岁的吸烟者进行了一项基于人群的代表性调查。评估了人口统计学变量、吸烟状况和戒烟动机。动机首先被评估为打算戒烟(使用行为改变阶段加上一个针对前意向阶段的修改阶段),其次是戒烟的愿望。

结果

大多数吸烟者想要戒烟(73.5%),而只有35.0%的人想要彻底戒烟。在各个国家中,10.2%的人绝对不想戒烟。大多数吸烟者可被归类为前意向阶段(根据国家不同,比例在62.6%至77.7%之间),这是行为改变阶段类别之一。行为改变阶段与所考察国家之间的关系具有统计学意义(卡方 = 43.466,p < 0.001)。在烟草控制水平较高的国家,处于前意向阶段的人群比例低于烟草控制活动较少的国家。

结论

在所考察的国家之间,行为改变阶段存在差异。然而,本分析中用于将国家分为低、中、高烟草控制活动的分类并不能解释这些差异。大多数吸烟者想要戒烟,但很大一部分人无法表明戒烟的时间框架。烟草控制措施或其他形式的支持可能会鼓励这些吸烟者真正尝试戒烟。需要在人群层面进行纵向研究,以评估、关联或监测烟草控制活动与戒烟意图。

相似文献

1
The relationship between smokers' motivation to quit and intensity of tobacco control at the population level: a comparison of five European countries.吸烟者戒烟动机与人群层面烟草控制强度之间的关系:五个欧洲国家的比较
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 3;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-2.
2
Distributions of smokers by stage: international comparison and association with smoking prevalence.按阶段划分的吸烟者分布情况:国际比较及与吸烟流行率的关联
Prev Med. 1997 Jul-Aug;26(4):580-5. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0179.
3
Associations between smoking prevalence, stages of change, cigarette consumption, and quit attempts across the United States.美国吸烟流行率、行为改变阶段、香烟消费量与戒烟尝试之间的关联。
Prev Med. 2004 Mar;38(3):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.006.
4
The new EU cigarette health warnings benefit smokers who want to quit the habit: results from the Dutch Continuous Survey of Smoking Habits.欧盟新的香烟健康警示对想要戒烟的吸烟者有益:荷兰吸烟习惯持续调查结果
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Aug;15(4):389-92. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki061. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
5
[Stages of motivation to change in smokers of the general population].[普通人群吸烟者改变动机的阶段]
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Oct;60(10):592-7.
6
Correlates of stages of change of smoking among inhabitants of deprived neighbourhoods.贫困社区居民吸烟行为改变阶段的相关因素。
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Apr;15(2):152-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki112.
7
Brief report: pain and readiness to quit smoking cigarettes.简短报告:疼痛与戒烟意愿
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Jun;8(3):473-80. doi: 10.1080/14622200600670355.
8
Depressed smokers and stage of change: implications for treatment interventions.抑郁吸烟者与改变阶段:对治疗干预的启示
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Nov 11;76(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.017.
9
Smokers' reasons for quitting in an anti-smoking social context.在反吸烟的社会环境下,吸烟者戒烟的原因。
Public Health. 2010 Apr;124(4):225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Apr 3.
10
The relationship of smoking cessation to sociodemographic characteristics, smoking intensity, and tobacco control policies.戒烟与社会人口学特征、吸烟强度及烟草控制政策的关系。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Jun;7(3):387-96. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125443.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypnotherapy compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy for smoking cessation in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,催眠疗法与认知行为疗法用于戒烟的比较。
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 27;15:1330362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1330362. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors associated with intentions to quit tobacco use in Lebanon: A cross-sectional survey.黎巴嫩与戒烟意愿相关的因素:一项横断面调查。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Dec 22;37:102572. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102572. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Motivation to stop smoking in the German population between 2016 - 2021 and associated factors: results from a repeated cross-sectional representative population survey (German Study on Tobacco Use, DEBRA study).2016 年至 2021 年德国人群戒烟动机及相关因素:一项重复横断面代表性人群调查(德国烟草使用研究,DEBRA 研究)的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 30;13(5):e068198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068198.
4
Disentangling craving- and valence-related brain responses to smoking cues in individuals with nicotine use disorder.解析尼古丁使用障碍个体对吸烟线索的渴求相关和效价相关的大脑反应。
Addict Biol. 2022 Jan;27(1):e13083. doi: 10.1111/adb.13083. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
5
Smoking Cessation and Vaping Cessation Attempts among Cigarette Smokers and E-Cigarette Users in Central and Eastern Europe.中欧和东欧的吸烟者和电子烟使用者的戒烟和电子烟戒烟尝试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;17(1):28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010028.
6
Impact of tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and quit ratios in 27 European Union countries from 2006 to 2014.2006 年至 2014 年 27 个欧盟国家控烟政策对吸烟率和戒烟率的影响。
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-109. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054119. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
7
Smoking behavior of males attending the quit tobacco clinics in Bahrain and their knowledge on tobacco smoking health hazards.巴林戒烟诊所男性就诊者的吸烟行为及其对吸烟危害健康的认识。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5104-7.
8
Cost-effectiveness of increasing the reach of smoking cessation interventions in Germany: results from the EQUIPTMOD.提高德国戒烟干预措施覆盖范围的成本效益:EQUIPTMOD 的结果。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):52-64. doi: 10.1111/add.14062. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
9
Association of Current and Lifetime DSM-IV Drug use Disorder Diagnoses to 6-Month Changes in Smoking Behavior in Risky Drinking Smokers: A Pilot Study.当前和终身 DSM-IV 药物使用障碍诊断与风险饮酒吸烟者 6 个月吸烟行为变化的关联:一项试点研究。
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Nov 10;52(13):1784-1794. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1313864. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Participant-level meta-analysis of mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation across different countries.不同国家基于手机的戒烟干预措施的个体水平荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2016 Aug;89:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Tobacco Control Scale: a new scale to measure country activity.烟草控制量表:一种衡量国家行动的新量表。
Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15(3):247-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.015347.
2
Measuring activities in tobacco control across the EU. The MATOC.衡量欧盟范围内烟草控制活动。烟草控制活动监测(MATOC)。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Apr 18;1:9. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-9.
3
Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest.是时候做出改变了:让跨理论(改变阶段)模型安息吧。
Addiction. 2005 Aug;100(8):1036-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01139.x.
4
Adult tobacco use levels after intensive tobacco control measures: New York City, 2002-2003.强化烟草控制措施实施后的成年人烟草使用水平:纽约市,2002 - 2003年
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jun;95(6):1016-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058164.
5
A short form of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence and the Heaviness of Smoking Index in two adult population samples.尼古丁依赖的Fagerström测试简版以及两个成年人群样本中的吸烟强度指数
Addict Behav. 2004 Aug;29(6):1207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.03.019.
6
Associations between smoking prevalence, stages of change, cigarette consumption, and quit attempts across the United States.美国吸烟流行率、行为改变阶段、香烟消费量与戒烟尝试之间的关联。
Prev Med. 2004 Mar;38(3):369-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.006.
7
Hardening and the hard-core smoker: concepts, evidence, and implications.成瘾与重度吸烟者:概念、证据及影响
Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Feb;5(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/1462220021000060428.
8
Distribution of daily smokers by stage of change: Current Population Survey results.按行为改变阶段划分的每日吸烟者分布情况:当前人口调查结果。
Prev Med. 2003 Jun;36(6):710-20. doi: 10.1016/s0091-7435(03)00044-6.
9
Subtypes of precontemplating smokers defined by different long-term plans to change their smoking behavior.通过不同长期改变吸烟行为计划定义的未打算戒烟吸烟者的亚型。
Health Educ Res. 2000 Aug;15(4):423-34. doi: 10.1093/her/15.4.423.
10
Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis.马萨诸塞州烟草控制项目的影响:基于人群的趋势分析
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):351-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7257.351.