• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推进基层医疗中跨专业共同决策方法的理论、模型与测量:一项研究方案

Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol.

作者信息

Légaré France, Stacey Dawn, Graham Ian D, Elwyn Glyn, Pluye Pierre, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Frosch Dominick, Harrison Margaret B, Kryworuchko Jennifer, Pouliot Sophie, Desroches Sophie

机构信息

Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 3;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-2.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-2
PMID:18173848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2265696/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared decision-making (SDM) is defined as a process by which a healthcare choice is made by practitioners together with the patient. Although many diagnostic and therapeutic processes in primary care integrate more than one type of health professional, most SDM conceptual models and theories appear to be limited to the patient-physician dyad. The objectives of this study are to develop a conceptual model and propose a set of measurement tools for enhancing an interprofessional approach to SDM in primary healthcare.

METHODS/DESIGN: An inventory of SDM conceptual models, theories and measurement tools will be created. Models will be critically assessed and compared according to their strengths, limitations, acknowledgement of interprofessional roles in the process of SDM and relevance to primary care. Based on the theory analysis, a conceptual model and a set of measurements tools that could be used to enhance an interprofessional approach to SDM in primary healthcare will be proposed and pilot-tested with key stakeholders and primary healthcare teams.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting future studies and educating health professionals to improve how primary healthcare teams foster active participation of patients in making health decisions using a more coordinated approach.

摘要

背景

共同决策(SDM)被定义为医疗从业者与患者共同做出医疗选择的过程。尽管初级保健中的许多诊断和治疗过程涉及不止一种类型的卫生专业人员,但大多数共同决策概念模型和理论似乎仅限于医患二元组。本研究的目的是开发一个概念模型,并提出一套测量工具,以加强初级卫生保健中共同决策的跨专业方法。

方法/设计:将创建一份共同决策概念模型、理论和测量工具的清单。将根据模型的优势、局限性、在共同决策过程中对跨专业角色的认可程度以及与初级保健的相关性对模型进行严格评估和比较。基于理论分析,将提出一个概念模型和一套可用于加强初级卫生保健中共同决策跨专业方法的测量工具,并与关键利益相关者和初级卫生保健团队进行试点测试。

讨论

本研究方案对于有兴趣设计和/或开展未来研究以及教育卫生专业人员以改善初级卫生保健团队如何采用更协调的方法促进患者积极参与健康决策的研究人员和临床医生具有参考价值。

相似文献

1
Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol.推进基层医疗中跨专业共同决策方法的理论、模型与测量:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 3;8:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-2.
2
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
3
Shared decision making models to inform an interprofessional perspective on decision making: a theory analysis.共享决策模型:从跨专业视角分析决策制定——理论研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
4
Shared Decision-Making Models Acknowledging an Interprofessional Approach: A Theory Analysis to Inform Nursing Practice.承认跨专业方法的共同决策模型:为护理实践提供信息的理论分析
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2016;30(1):26-43. doi: 10.1891/1541-6577.30.1.26.
5
Interprofessionalism and shared decision-making in primary care: a stepwise approach towards a new model.初级保健中的跨专业合作和共同决策:迈向新模式的逐步方法。
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):18-25. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.490502. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
6
A conceptual framework for interprofessional shared decision making in home care: protocol for a feasibility study.家庭护理中跨专业共享决策的概念框架:一项可行性研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 31;11:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-23.
7
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.
8
Needs of parents and professionals to improve shared decision-making in interprofessional maternity care practice: A qualitative study.父母和专业人员对改善跨专业产科护理实践中共同决策的需求:一项定性研究。
Birth. 2018 Sep;45(3):245-254. doi: 10.1111/birt.12379. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
9
Enhancing interprofessionalism in shared decision-making training within homecare settings: a short report.强化居家护理环境中共同决策培训中的跨专业合作:简短报告。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Jan-Feb;34(1):143-146. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1623764. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies.照顾者在为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗决策时的支持需求:基于 Noblit 和 Hare 元质化综合定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608.
2
Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension - Health Equity Implications.改善高血压患者共同决策的伙伴关系 - 健康公平影响。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):97-102. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.97. eCollection 2019.
3
Managerial leadership for research use in nursing and allied health care professions: a systematic review.管理领导力在护理和相关医疗保健专业中的研究应用:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 27;13(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0817-7.
4
Deciding How to Stay Independent at Home in Later Years: Development and Acceptability Testing of an Informative Web-Based Module.决定如何在晚年居家保持独立:一个基于网络的信息模块的开发与可接受性测试
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Dec 14;4(4):e32. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.8387.
5
Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocol.基层医疗中具有复杂护理需求患者的决策需求评估:一项参与式系统混合研究综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 12;7(11):e016400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400.
6
Development of a decision guide to support the elderly in decision making about location of care: an iterative, user-centered design.制定一项决策指南,以支持老年人在护理地点决策方面的决策:一种迭代的、以用户为中心的设计。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jul 19;2:26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0040-0. eCollection 2016.
7
Modeling Patient Treatment With Medical Records: An Abstraction Hierarchy to Understand User Competencies and Needs.利用医疗记录对患者治疗进行建模:用于理解用户能力和需求的抽象层次结构。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Jul 28;4(3):e16. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.6857.
8
The Evolution of an Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Research Program: Reflective Case Study of an Emerging Paradigm.跨专业共同决策研究项目的演变:新兴范式的反思性案例研究
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Jul 19;16(3):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2212.
9
Interprofessional primary care team meetings: a qualitative approach comparing observations with personal opinions.跨专业初级保健团队会议:一种将观察结果与个人观点进行比较的定性方法。
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):98-106. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw106. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Recommendations for Providers on Person-Centered Approaches to Assess and Improve Medication Adherence.给医疗服务提供者的关于以患者为中心的评估和改善药物依从性方法的建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):93-100. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3851-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting patients facing difficult health care decisions: use of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework.支持面临艰难医疗保健决策的患者:渥太华决策支持框架的应用
Can Fam Physician. 2006 Apr;52(4):476-7.
2
Barriers and facilitators influencing call center nurses' decision support for callers facing values-sensitive decisions: a mixed methods study.影响呼叫中心护士为面临价值观敏感决策的来电者提供决策支持的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2005;2(4):184-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2005.00035.x.
3
Is it a focus group? Tips on how to tell.这是一个焦点小组吗?判断方法小贴士。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2006 Jul-Aug;33(4):363-6. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200607000-00003.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.临床实践中实施共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对卫生专业人员认知的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16.
5
Toward 2020: visions for nursing setting the stage for the future.迈向2020年:护理愿景为未来奠定基础。
Can Nurse. 2006 May;102(5):22-3.
6
The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations.背景对证据利用的影响:为制定卫生政策建议的专家小组构建的一个框架
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(7):1811-24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.020. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
7
Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.患者对信息、决策和人际行为的偏好的最佳匹配:证据、模型与干预措施
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):319-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
8
Patient involvement: a vital principle for patient-centred health care.患者参与:以患者为中心的医疗保健的一项重要原则。
World Hosp Health Serv. 2005;41(2):12-6, 40-3.
9
Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making.促进明智选择:转变医疗保健模式以提供决策所需知识。
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Aug 16;143(4):293-300. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-4-200508160-00010.
10
Effectiveness of pre-licensure interprofessional education and post-licensure collaborative interventions.执照前跨专业教育和执照后协作干预的效果
J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19 Suppl 1:148-65. doi: 10.1080/13561820500082800.