• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照顾者在为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗决策时的支持需求:基于 Noblit 和 Hare 元质化综合定性研究的系统评价。

Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies.

机构信息

Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK

Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, The University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608
PMID:34930737
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8689175/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are 50 million dementia sufferers worldwide. Decisions about healthcare often need to be made when the person with dementia lacks capacity to do so.Understanding the support needs of carers acting as proxy healthcare decision-makers will be vital in improving the decision-making process for people with dementia and addressing the holistic needs of carers.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to review the existing literature on the support needs of carers acting as proxy healthcare decision-makers for people with dementia.

DESIGN

A qualitative systematic review protocol was published on PROSPERO. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise study quality. A meta-ethnographic synthesis was performed to develop third-order constructs.

DATA SOURCES

A search was conducted using three online databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO).

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: primary qualitative research involving carers of people with dementia who had been involved in making proxy healthcare decisions.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent researchers conducted validity assessments for each paper selected for inclusion, and discrepancies were resolved by discussions with a third reviewer. Nvivo software was used and conceptual findings from study papers lead to interpretations of findings by the team.

RESULTS

From the 15 papers included in the study, three main domains arose from the meta-ethnography; informational, practical and emotional. Informational support needs included information about dementia itself and the anticipated disease trajectory. Practical needs included continuity of care, person-centred care and the use of legal frameworks.Emotional support included recognising the guilt that healthcare decisions can provoke and the importance of providing guidance in an empathic manner.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-ethnography highlights opportunities for healthcare professionals and policymakers to improve experiences of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020124485.

摘要

背景

全球有 5000 万痴呆症患者。当痴呆症患者丧失做出医疗保健决策的能力时,往往需要他人做出决策。了解作为代理医疗保健决策者的护理人员的支持需求,对于改善痴呆症患者的决策过程和满足护理人员的整体需求至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在综述关于作为痴呆症患者代理医疗保健决策者的护理人员支持需求的现有文献。

设计

在 PROSPERO 上发布了一份定性系统评价方案。使用批判性评估技能计划清单来评估研究质量。进行了元民族志综合分析,以开发第三级结构。

数据来源

使用三个在线数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO)进行了搜索。

入选标准

纳入标准为涉及参与代理医疗保健决策的痴呆症患者的护理人员的初级定性研究。

数据提取与综合

两名独立研究人员对每一篇入选论文进行有效性评估,如有分歧,则由第三名评审员进行讨论解决。使用 Nvivo 软件,研究论文的概念性发现导致团队对研究结果进行解释。

结果

从纳入的 15 篇论文中,元民族志产生了三个主要领域;信息、实践和情感。信息支持需求包括有关痴呆症本身和预期疾病轨迹的信息。实践需求包括连续性护理、以患者为中心的护理以及法律框架的使用。情感支持包括认识到医疗保健决策可能引发的内疚感,以及以共情方式提供指导的重要性。

结论

本次元民族志研究强调了医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者有机会改善护理人员为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗保健决策的体验。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020124485。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6607/8689175/9f94c9ff0665/bmjopen-2021-052608f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6607/8689175/9f94c9ff0665/bmjopen-2021-052608f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6607/8689175/9f94c9ff0665/bmjopen-2021-052608f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Support needs of carers making proxy healthcare decisions for people with dementia: a systematic review based on the Noblit and Hare meta-ethnographic synthesis of qualitative studies.照顾者在为痴呆症患者做出代理医疗决策时的支持需求:基于 Noblit 和 Hare 元质化综合定性研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):e052608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052608.
2
Key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review.关键利益相关者对痴呆症患者的暂息服务的体验及其对暂息服务发展的看法:定性系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0676-0.
3
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
4
A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to and interventions for proxy decision-making by family carers of people with dementia.对痴呆症患者家庭照料者代理决策的障碍、促进因素及干预措施的系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Aug;27(8):1301-12. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215000411. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Experiences of parents and carers in managing asthma in children: a qualitative systematic review.父母及照顾者管理儿童哮喘的经验:一项定性系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 May;17(5):793-984. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-004019.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
Stroke survivors' and informal caregivers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services - A systematic review and meta-ethnography.中风幸存者及非正式照护者对初级保健和社区医疗服务的体验——一项系统评价与元民族志研究
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533. eCollection 2018.
9
Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: Healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities.为痴呆症患者的替代决策者提供支持:医疗保健专业人员、组织及社区的责任。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Sep;25(5):1563-1570. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12456. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Agency in dementia care: systematic review and meta-ethnography.痴呆症护理中的代理:系统评价和元民族志。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):627-642. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218001801. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Care Partner Perspectives on the Use of a Patient Portal Intervention to Promote Care Partner Identification in Dementia Care.护理伙伴对使用患者门户网站干预措施以促进痴呆症护理中护理伙伴身份识别的看法。
J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jan;44(1):136-146. doi: 10.1177/07334648241262649. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Preference of caregivers on residential care homes for older persons with versus without communication problems: a discrete choice experiment.有沟通问题与无沟通问题的老年人的照护者对养老院的偏好:离散选择实验。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 10;22(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03073-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review.初级医疗保健的连续性与患者死亡率:一项系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Aug 27;70(698):e600-e611. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712289. Print 2020 Sep.
2
The Challenges and Opportunities for Shared Decision Making Highlighted by COVID-19.新冠疫情凸显了共同决策面临的挑战和机遇。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2474-2480.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Decision-making in cancer care for people living with dementia.癌症护理决策:关注痴呆症患者
Psychooncology. 2020 Aug;29(8):1347-1354. doi: 10.1002/pon.5448. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health.后 COVID-19 时代心理健康的孤独、隔离和社会支持因素。
Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S55-S57. doi: 10.1037/tra0000703. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Clarifying the information and support needs of family caregivers of nursing home residents with advancing dementia.明确养老院中处于痴呆晚期的居民的家庭护理人员的信息和支持需求。
Dementia (London). 2021 May;20(4):1250-1269. doi: 10.1177/1471301220927617. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Factors influencing the transition experience of carers for persons with dementia, when the person with dementia moves into residential care: systematic review and meta-synthesis.痴呆症患者入住机构护理时影响其照护者过渡体验的因素:系统评价与元整合
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Sep;24(9):1371-1380. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1602591. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: the eMERGe reporting guidance.改善元分析报告:eMERGe 报告指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0.
8
Caregiver decisions along the Alzheimer's disease trajectory.照顾者在阿尔茨海默病病程中的决策。
Geriatr Nurs. 2019 May-Jun;40(3):257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
9
Perspectives of people with dementia and carers on advance care planning and end-of-life care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.痴呆症患者和护理人员对预先护理计划和临终关怀的看法:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合。
Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;33(3):274-290. doi: 10.1177/0269216318809571. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
10
Continuity of care with doctors-a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality.医患连续性照护——生死攸关?连续性照护与死亡率的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 28;8(6):e021161. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161.