Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Québec, Canada.
J Interprof Care. 2011 Jan;25(1):18-25. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.490502. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Most shared decision-making (SDM) models within healthcare have been limited to the patient-physician dyad. As a first step towards promoting an interprofessional approach to SDM in primary care, this article reports how an interprofessional and interdisciplinary group developed and achieved consensus on a new interprofessional SDM model. The key concepts within published reviews of SDM models and interprofessionalism were identified, analysed, and discussed by the group in order to reach consensus on the new interprofessional SDM (IP-SDM) model. The IP-SDM model comprises three levels: the individual (micro) level and two healthcare system (meso and macro) levels. At the individual level, the patient presents with a health condition that requires decision-making and follows a structured process to make an informed, value-based decision in concert with a team of healthcare professionals. The model acknowledges (at the meso level) the influence of individual team members' professional roles including the decision coach and organizational routines. At the macro level it acknowledges the influence of system level factors (i.e. health policies, professional organisations, and social context) on the meso and individual levels. Subsequently, the IP-SDM model will be validated with other stakeholders.
大多数医疗保健中的共享决策 (SDM) 模型都仅限于医患二人组。作为在初级保健中推广跨专业 SDM 方法的第一步,本文报告了一个跨专业和跨学科小组如何制定并就新的跨专业 SDM 模型达成共识。该小组通过对 SDM 模型和跨专业主义的已发表评论中的关键概念进行识别、分析和讨论,以就新的跨专业 SDM(IP-SDM)模型达成共识。该 IP-SDM 模型由三个层次组成:个体(微观)层面和两个医疗保健系统(中观和宏观)层面。在个体层面,患者出现需要决策的健康状况,并遵循结构化流程,与医疗保健专业人员团队一起做出明智、基于价值观的决策。该模型承认(在中观层面)个体团队成员的专业角色的影响,包括决策教练和组织惯例。在宏观层面,它承认系统层面因素(即卫生政策、专业组织和社会背景)对中观和个体层面的影响。随后,将与其他利益相关者一起验证该 IP-SDM 模型。