• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

敏感话题定性研究中研究者面临的风险:问题与策略

Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies.

作者信息

Dickson-Swift Virginia, James Erica L, Kippen Sandra, Liamputtong Pranee

机构信息

School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):133-44. doi: 10.1177/1049732307309007.

DOI:10.1177/1049732307309007
PMID:18174541
Abstract

Traditionally, risk assessments in research have been limited to examining the risks to the research participants. Although doing so is appropriate and important, there is growing recognition that undertaking research can pose risks to researchers as well. A grounded theory study involving a range of researchers who had undertaken qualitative health research on a sensitive topic was completed. Analysis of the in-depth, face-to-face unstructured individual interviews with 30 Australian public health researchers provided evidence that researchers do confront a number of physical and emotional risks when undertaking research. Training, preparation, and supervision must be taken into account so that the risk to researchers can be minimized. Researchers need to consider occupational health and safety issues in designing research projects that deal with physical and emotional risks. Recommendations for professional supervision, policy development, and minimum training standards for researchers are provided.

摘要

传统上,研究中的风险评估仅限于考察对研究参与者的风险。虽然这样做是恰当且重要的,但人们越来越认识到开展研究也可能给研究人员带来风险。一项扎根理论研究完成了,该研究涉及一系列对敏感话题进行定性健康研究的研究人员。对30名澳大利亚公共卫生研究人员进行的深入、面对面、非结构化的个人访谈分析表明,研究人员在开展研究时确实面临一些身体和情感上的风险。必须考虑培训、准备和监督,以便将对研究人员的风险降至最低。研究人员在设计应对身体和情感风险的研究项目时需要考虑职业健康和安全问题。文中还提供了关于专业监督、政策制定以及研究人员最低培训标准的建议。

相似文献

1
Risk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies.敏感话题定性研究中研究者面临的风险:问题与策略
Qual Health Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):133-44. doi: 10.1177/1049732307309007.
2
Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics.敏感话题定性健康研究中的界限模糊问题。
Qual Health Res. 2006 Jul;16(6):853-71. doi: 10.1177/1049732306287526.
3
Keeping nurse researchers safe: workplace health and safety issues.保障护士研究人员的安全:工作场所健康与安全问题。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jul;68(7):1538-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.05942.x. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
4
Perceptions about safety and risks in gender-based violence research: implications for the ethics review process.关于基于性别的暴力研究中的安全性和风险认知:对伦理审查过程的影响。
Cult Health Sex. 2011 Oct;13(9):1091-102. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.604429. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
5
Reflexive journaling on emotional research topics: ethical issues for team researchers.关于情感研究主题的反思性日志记录:团队研究人员的伦理问题。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1329-39. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308948.
6
Communication deficiencies in research and monitoring by ethics committees.伦理委员会在研究与监测方面的沟通缺陷。
Intern Med J. 2006 Feb;36(2):86-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01016.x.
7
Exploring painful experiences: impact of emotional narratives on members of a qualitative research team.探索痛苦经历:情感叙事对一个定性研究团队成员的影响
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(6):607-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04039.x.
8
Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people.我妈妈会听到这个吗?针对年轻人的定性健康研究中的方法学和伦理挑战。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Dec;69(11):1691-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
9
From "our world" to the "real world": Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers.从“我们的世界”到“现实世界”:探索有政策影响力的澳大利亚公共卫生研究人员的观点和行为。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(7):1047-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
10
"Researcher saturation": the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process.“研究者饱和”:数据三角互证与深度研究实践对研究者及质性研究过程的影响
Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1392-402. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308308.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling Preferences in Closed Communities: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Elicit Ultra-Orthodox Women Preferences for Video Consultations in Primary Care.揭示封闭社区中的偏好:开发离散选择实验(DCE)问卷以引出极端正统派女性对初级保健视频咨询的偏好。
Patient. 2025 May;18(3):263-277. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00734-w. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Suicidal Behaviors and Associated Factors Among Adult Psychiatric Patients Attending Psychiatric Clinic at Public Hospitals in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚公立医院精神科诊所就诊的成年精神科患者中的自杀行为及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241282653. doi: 10.1177/00469580241282653.
3
Considering Risks to Researchers and Staff in Low-Resource Settings during Public Health Crises: A Proposed Conceptual Model.
公共卫生危机期间低资源环境下研究人员和工作人员面临的风险:一个概念模型建议
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):463. doi: 10.3390/children10030463.
4
Researching Alcohol Consumption During Pregnancy. Opportunities and Challenges With Two Methods of Data Acquisition.研究孕期饮酒。两种数据采集方法的机遇与挑战。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Oct;32(12):1809-1827. doi: 10.1177/10497323221119005. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
5
Women Caring for Husbands Living with Parkinson's Disease: A Phenomenological Study Protocol.照顾患帕金森病丈夫的女性:一项现象学研究方案
J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 20;12(5):659. doi: 10.3390/jpm12050659.
6
Opening the Black Box of Daily Life in Nonsuicidal Self-injury Research: With Great Opportunity Comes Great Responsibility.打开非自杀性自伤研究中日常生活的黑匣子:机遇越大,责任越大。
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 19;8(11):e30915. doi: 10.2196/30915.
7
Development and evaluation of guidelines for prevention of retraumatisation in torture survivors during surgical care: protocol for a multistage qualitative study.制定和评估外科护理中预防酷刑幸存者再创伤的指南:多阶段定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 5;11(11):e053670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053670.
8
Disclosure of non-recent (historic) childhood sexual abuse: What should researchers do?披露非近期(历史性)童年期性虐待经历:研究人员该怎么做?
J Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 10;47(12):779-83. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106343.
9
Community engagement and building trust to resolve ethical challenges during humanitarian crises: experience from the CAGED study.社区参与和建立信任以解决人道主义危机期间的伦理挑战:CAGED研究的经验
Confl Health. 2020 Oct 6;14:68. doi: 10.1186/s13031-020-00313-w. eCollection 2020.
10
Investigating the benefits and challenges of including bereaved women in research: a multifaceted perinatal audit in a socially disadvantaged French district.调查让失去亲人的女性参与研究的益处与挑战:法国一个社会处境不利地区的多层面围产期审计。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;10(9):e034715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034715.