Suppr超能文献

严重周边视野缺损患者的交通间隙判断

Traffic gap judgment in people with significant peripheral field loss.

作者信息

Cheong Allen M Y, Geruschat Duane R, Congdon Nathan

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;85(1):26-36. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31815ed6fd.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Subjects with significant peripheral field loss (PFL) self report difficulty in street crossing. In this study, we compared the traffic gap judgment ability of fully sighted and PFL subjects to determine whether accuracy in identifying crossable gaps was adversely affected because of field loss. Moreover, we explored the contribution of visual and nonvisual factors to traffic gap judgment ability.

METHODS

Eight subjects with significant PFL as a result of advanced retinitis pigmentosa or glaucoma with binocular visual field <20 degrees and five age-matched normals (NV) were recruited. All subjects were required to judge when they perceived it was safe to cross at a 2-way 4-lane street while they stood on the curb. Eye movements were recorded by an eye tracker as the subjects performed the decision task. Movies of the eye-on-scene were made offline and fixation patterns were classified into either relevant or irrelevant. Subjects' street-crossing behavior, habitual approach to street crossing, and perceived difficulties were assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with normal vision (NV) subjects, the PFL subjects identified 12% fewer crossable gaps while making 23% more errors by identifying a gap as crossable when it was too short (p < 0.05). The differences in traffic gap judgment ability of the PFL subjects might be explained by the significantly smaller fixation area (p = 0.006) and fewer fixations distributed to the relevant tasks (p = 0.001). The subjects' habitual approach to street crossing and perceived difficulties in street crossing (r > 0.60) were significantly correlated with traffic gap judgment performance.

CONCLUSIONS

As a consequence of significant field loss, limited visual information about the traffic environment can be acquired, resulting in significantly reduced performance in judging safe crossable gaps. This poor traffic gap judgment ability in the PFL subjects raises important concerns for their safety when attempting to cross the street.

摘要

目的

患有严重周边视野缺损(PFL)的受试者自述在过马路时存在困难。在本研究中,我们比较了视力正常者和PFL受试者的交通间隙判断能力,以确定视野缺损是否会对识别可穿越间隙的准确性产生不利影响。此外,我们还探讨了视觉和非视觉因素对交通间隙判断能力的作用。

方法

招募了8名因晚期视网膜色素变性或青光眼导致严重PFL且双眼视野<20度的受试者,以及5名年龄匹配的正常视力(NV)者。所有受试者站在路边时,需判断他们认为在双向四车道街道上何时过马路是安全的。在受试者执行决策任务时,用眼动仪记录眼动情况。离线制作眼在场景的视频,并将注视模式分类为相关或不相关。评估受试者的过马路行为、习惯性过马路方式以及感知到的困难。

结果

与正常视力(NV)受试者相比,PFL受试者识别出的可穿越间隙少12%,同时在将过短间隙误判为可穿越时犯错多23%(p<0.05)。PFL受试者交通间隙判断能力的差异可能是由于注视区域明显更小(p = 0.006)以及分配到相关任务的注视次数更少(p = 0.001)所致。受试者习惯性过马路方式以及感知到的过马路困难(r>0.60)与交通间隙判断表现显著相关。

结论

由于严重的视野缺损,关于交通环境的视觉信息获取受限,导致判断安全可穿越间隙的能力显著下降。PFL受试者这种较差的交通间隙判断能力对他们过马路时的安全提出了重要担忧。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验