Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Apr;97(4):229-238. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001502.
This study explored the street-crossing decision-making performance of young normally sighted subjects with simulated central field loss (CFL). The results suggest that using eccentric viewing enables a person to make safe and reliable street-crossing decisions.
This study tested the hypothesis that, as the diameter of an experimentally induced central scotoma increases, the accuracy and reliability of street-crossing decisions worsen.
Street-crossing decisions were measured in 20 young subjects aged between 23 and 31 years while monocularly viewing a nonsignalized, one-way street for different vehicular arrival times. Using a 5-point rating scale, subjects judged whether they could cross the street before vehicular arrival with habitual vision and simulated CFL with eccentric viewing. The CFL was induced using soft contact lenses with different central opaque diameters. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we obtained subjects' accuracy (amount of time in seconds where subjects either overestimated or underestimated vehicular arrival time relative to their actual crossing time) and reliability (how quickly subjects transitioned from judging insufficient to sufficient time to cross relative to their actual crossing time).
The centrally opaque contact lenses induced central scotomata with a mean (standard deviation) diameter of 17.12° (5.83°). No significant difference in street-crossing accuracy (P = .35) or reliability (P = .09) was found between the normal, habitual vision and simulated CFL conditions. No statistically significant correlations were found between scotoma diameter and the accuracy and reliability of subjects' street-crossing decisions (P = .83 and P = .95, respectively).
The findings of this study suggest that adopting eccentric viewing enables a person to successfully mitigate the negative effects of an absolute central scotoma on the accuracy and reliability of their street-crossing decisions.
本研究探索了具有模拟中心视野损失(CFL)的年轻正常视力受试者的过街决策表现。结果表明,使用偏心观看可以使人做出安全可靠的过街决策。
本研究检验了以下假设,即随着实验诱导的中央暗点直径的增加,过街决策的准确性和可靠性会恶化。
20 名年龄在 23 至 31 岁之间的年轻受试者单眼观察不同车辆到达时间的无信号单向街道,测量过街决策。使用 5 分制评分量表,受试者判断在使用习惯视力和偏心观看模拟 CFL 时,他们是否可以在车辆到达之前穿过街道。CFL 是通过使用具有不同中心不透明直径的软性隐形眼镜来诱导的。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析,我们获得了受试者的准确性(相对于实际穿越时间,受试者高估或低估车辆到达时间的时间量)和可靠性(相对于实际穿越时间,受试者判断穿越时间不足到足够的时间的过渡速度)。
中心不透明隐形眼镜诱导的中心暗点平均(标准差)直径为 17.12°(5.83°)。在正常、习惯视力和模拟 CFL 条件下,过街准确性(P=.35)或可靠性(P=.09)没有显著差异。在受试者的过街决策准确性和可靠性与暗点直径之间未发现统计学上显著的相关性(P=.83 和 P=.95,分别)。
本研究的结果表明,采用偏心观看可以使人成功减轻绝对中心暗点对过街决策准确性和可靠性的负面影响。