Reinold Michael M, Macrina Leonard C, Wilk Kevin E, Fleisig Glenn S, Dun Shouchen, Barrentine Steven W, Ellerbusch Michael T, Andrews James R
Boston Red Sox Baseball Club, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):464-9.
Investigators have observed electromyographic (EMG) activity of the supraspinatus muscle and reported conflicting results.
To quantify EMG activity of the supraspinatus, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid muscles during exercises commonly used in rehabilitation.
One-factor, repeated-measures design.
Controlled laboratory.
Twenty-two asymptomatic subjects (15 men, 7 women) with no history of shoulder injury participated.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): The dominant shoulder was tested. Fine-wire EMG electrodes were inserted into the supraspinatus, middle deltoid, and posterior deltoid muscles. The EMG data were collected at 960 Hz for analysis during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and 5 repetitions of 3 exercises: standing elevation in the scapular plane ("full can"), standing elevation in the scapular plane with glenohumeral internal rotation ("empty can"), and prone horizontal abduction at 100 degrees with glenohumeral external rotation ("prone full can"). We calculated 1-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (P < .05) and post hoc 2-tailed, paired t tests to detect significant differences in muscle activity among exercises.
No statistical difference existed among the exercises for the supraspinatus. The middle deltoid showed significantly greater activity during the empty-can exercise (77 +/- 44% MVIC) and prone full-can exercise (63 +/- 31% MVIC) than during the full-can exercise (52 +/- 27% MVIC) (P = .001 and .017, respectively). The posterior deltoid showed significantly greater activity during the prone full-can exercise (87 +/- 53% MVIC) than during the full-can (P = .001) and the empty-can (P = .005) exercises and significantly greater activity during the empty-can exercise (54 +/- 24% MVIC) than during the full-can exercise (38 +/- 32% MVIC) (P = .012).
While all 3 exercises produced similar amounts of supraspinatus activity, the full-can exercise produced significantly less activity of the deltoid muscles and may be the optimal position to recruit the supraspinatus muscle for rehabilitation and testing. The empty-can exercise may be a good exercise to recruit the middle deltoid muscle, and the prone full-can exercise may be a good exercise to recruit the posterior deltoid muscle.
研究人员观察了冈上肌的肌电图(EMG)活动,并报告了相互矛盾的结果。
量化康复中常用运动期间冈上肌、三角肌中束和三角肌后束的肌电图活动。
单因素重复测量设计。
受控实验室。
22名无肩部损伤史的无症状受试者(15名男性,7名女性)参与。
测试优势肩。将细丝肌电图电极插入冈上肌、三角肌中束和三角肌后束。在最大自主等长收缩(MVIC)期间以及3种运动的5次重复过程中,以960Hz收集肌电图数据进行分析,这3种运动分别为:肩胛平面站立上举(“全罐”)、肩胛平面站立上举并伴肱盂内旋(“空罐”)以及俯卧位100度水平外展并伴肱盂外旋(“俯卧全罐”)。我们计算单向重复测量方差分析(P <.05)以及事后双尾配对t检验,以检测各运动之间肌肉活动的显著差异。
冈上肌在各运动之间不存在统计学差异。三角肌中束在“空罐”运动(77 +/- 44% MVIC)和“俯卧全罐”运动(63 +/- 31% MVIC)期间的活动显著高于“全罐”运动(52 +/- 27% MVIC)(分别为P =.001和.017)。三角肌后束在“俯卧全罐”运动(87 +/- 53% MVIC)期间的活动显著高于“全罐”运动(P =.001)和“空罐”运动(P =.005),且在“空罐”运动(54 +/- 24% MVIC)期间的活动显著高于“全罐”运动(38 +/- 32% MVIC)(P =.012)。
虽然所有3种运动产生的冈上肌活动量相似,但“全罐”运动产生的三角肌活动显著较少,可能是康复和测试中募集冈上肌的最佳姿势。“空罐”运动可能是募集三角肌中束的良好运动,而“俯卧全罐”运动可能是募集三角肌后束的良好运动。