Suppr超能文献

高位下拉动作中,前侧与后侧主要发力肌肉的高密度肌电图激发情况对比

High-Density Electromyography Excitation in Front vs. Back Lat Pull-Down Prime Movers.

作者信息

Padovan Riccardo, Toninelli Nicholas, Longo Stefano, Tornatore Gianpaolo, Esposito Fabio, Cè Emiliano, Coratella Giuseppe

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Hum Kinet. 2024 Apr 15;91(Spec Issue):47-60. doi: 10.5114/jhk/185211. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

The current study compared the spatial excitation of the primary muscles during the lat pull-down exercise with the bar passing in front (front-LPD) or behind the neck (back-LPD) using high-density electromyography. Fourteen resistance trained men performed a front-LPD or a back-LPD within a non-fatiguing set with 8-RM as the external load. The muscle excitation centroid of latissimus dorsi, middle trapezius, pectoralis major, biceps brachii, triceps brachii and posterior deltoid muscles were recorded during the ascending and the descending phase. During the descending phase, the front-LPD showed superior excitation of the latissimus dorsi (ES = 0.97) and the pectoralis major (ES = 1.17), while in the ascending phase, the back-LPD exhibited superior excitation of the latissimus dorsi (ES = 0.63), and the front-LPD showed superior excitation of the biceps brachii (ES = 0.41) and the posterior deltoid (ES = 1.77). During the descending phase, the front-LPD showed a more lateral centroid of the latissimus dorsi (ES = 0.60), the biceps brachii (ES = 0.63) and the triceps brachii (ES = 0.98), while the centroid was more medial for the middle trapezius (ES = 0.58). The centroid of the middle trapezius was also more medial in the front-LPD during the ascending phase (ES = 0.85). The pectoralis major centroid was more cranial in the front-LPD for both the descending (ES = 1.58) and the ascending phase (ES = 0.88). The front-LPD appears to provide overall greater excitation in the prime movers. However, distinct spatial excitation patterns were observed, making exercise suitable for the training routine.

摘要

本研究使用高密度肌电图比较了在下拉练习中,杠铃从身前(身前下拉)或颈后(颈后下拉)通过时主要肌肉的空间兴奋情况。14名进行过抗阻训练的男性在一组非疲劳性练习中以8RM作为外部负荷进行身前下拉或颈后下拉。在上升和下降阶段记录背阔肌、斜方肌中部、胸大肌、肱二头肌、肱三头肌和三角肌后束的肌肉兴奋质心。在下降阶段,身前下拉显示背阔肌(效应量=0.97)和胸大肌(效应量=1.17)的兴奋度更高,而在上升阶段,颈后下拉显示背阔肌的兴奋度更高(效应量=0.63),身前下拉显示肱二头肌(效应量=0.41)和三角肌后束(效应量=1.77)的兴奋度更高。在下降阶段,身前下拉显示背阔肌(效应量=0.60)、肱二头肌(效应量=0.63)和肱三头肌(效应量=0.98)的质心更偏外侧,而斜方肌中部的质心更偏内侧(效应量=0.58)。在上升阶段,身前下拉时斜方肌中部的质心也更偏内侧(效应量=0.85)。在下降阶段(效应量=1.58)和上升阶段(效应量=0.88),身前下拉时胸大肌的质心都更靠上。身前下拉似乎能在主要运动肌中提供总体更大的兴奋度。然而,观察到了不同的空间兴奋模式,这使得该练习适用于训练方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ded0/11057623/c55405543246/JHK-91-185211-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验