Suppr超能文献

ImPact 测试重测信度:可靠不可靠?

ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?

机构信息

University of Texas at Arlington, Box 19259, 113 Maverick Activities Center, Arlington, TX 76102, USA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):506-11. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09. Epub 2013 May 31.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Computerized neuropsychological testing is commonly used in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion. Even though computerized testing is widespread, psychometric evidence for test-retest reliability is somewhat limited. Additional evidence for test-retest reliability is needed to optimize clinical decision making after concussion.

OBJECTIVE

To document test-retest reliability for a commercially available computerized neuropsychological test battery (ImPACT) using 2 different clinically relevant time intervals.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Two research laboratories.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Group 1 (n = 46) consisted of 25 men and 21 women (age = 22.4 ± 1.89 years). Group 2 (n = 45) consisted of 17 men and 28 women (age = 20.9 ± 1.72 years).

INTERVENTION(S): Both groups completed ImPACT forms 1, 2, and 3, which were delivered sequentially either at 1-week intervals (group 1) or at baseline, day 45, and day 50 (group 2). Group 2 also completed the Green Word Memory Test (WMT) as a measure of effort.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the composite scores of ImPACT between time points. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate changes in ImPACT and WMT results over time.

RESULTS

The ICC values for group 1 ranged from 0.26 to 0.88 for the 4 ImPACT composite scores. The ICC values for group 2 ranged from 0.37 to 0.76. In group 1, ImPACT classified 37.0% and 46.0% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, ImPACT classified 22.2% and 28.9% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We found variable test-retest reliability for ImPACT metrics. Visual motor speed and reaction time demonstrated greater reliability than verbal and visual memory. Our current data support a multifaceted approach to concussion assessment using clinical examinations, symptom reports, cognitive testing, and balance assessment.

摘要

背景

计算机化神经心理学测试常用于评估和管理与运动相关的脑震荡。尽管计算机化测试已经广泛应用,但测试-再测试可靠性的心理测量学证据仍有些局限。在脑震荡后优化临床决策需要更多关于测试-再测试可靠性的证据。

目的

使用 2 个不同的临床相关时间间隔记录商业化的计算机化神经心理学测试组合(ImPACT)的测试-再测试可靠性。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

两个研究实验室。

患者或其他参与者

第 1 组(n = 46)包括 25 名男性和 21 名女性(年龄=22.4 ± 1.89 岁)。第 2 组(n = 45)包括 17 名男性和 28 名女性(年龄=20.9 ± 1.72 岁)。

干预

两组均依次完成 ImPACT 形式 1、2 和 3,第 1 组间隔 1 周,第 2 组间隔基线、第 45 天和第 50 天。第 2 组还完成了绿字记忆测试(WMT)作为努力的衡量标准。

主要观察指标

计算时间点之间的 ImPACT 综合评分的组内相关系数(ICC)。使用重复测量方差分析评估 ImPACT 和 WMT 结果随时间的变化。

结果

第 1 组的 ICC 值范围为 0.26 至 0.88,涉及 4 个 ImPACT 综合评分。第 2 组的 ICC 值范围为 0.37 至 0.76。在第 1 组中,ImPACT 将 37.0%和 46.0%的健康参与者分别归类为第 2 个和第 3 个时间点的损伤。在第 2 组中,ImPACT 将 22.2%和 28.9%的健康参与者分别归类为第 2 个和第 3 个时间点的损伤。

结论

我们发现 ImPACT 指标的测试-再测试可靠性存在差异。视觉运动速度和反应时间的可靠性大于言语和视觉记忆。我们目前的数据支持使用临床检查、症状报告、认知测试和平衡评估对脑震荡进行多方面评估的方法。

相似文献

1
ImPact test-retest reliability: reliably unreliable?
J Athl Train. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):506-11. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09. Epub 2013 May 31.
2
The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt A):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
4
Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):2000-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546514535901. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 May;40(4):377-388. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2017.1353590. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
6
Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;7(5):443-7. doi: 10.1177/1941738115586997. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):367-72. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000139.
9
Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Oct;38(8):869-74. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1168781. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2018 Jul-Sep;7(3):208-216. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2017.1290529. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

3
Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Jul 24;39(5):626-634. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae002.
5
Eye tracking for classification of concussion in adults and pediatrics.
Front Neurol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1039955. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1039955. eCollection 2022.
6
Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Test Administered Remotely.
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):981-986. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0381.22.
8
Test-Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb 23;37(2):449-456. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab055.
10
Concussion-related deficits in the general population predict impairments in varsity footballers.
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):1970-1979. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09749-9. Epub 2020 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2319-24. doi: 10.1177/0363546511417173. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
2
Long-term test-retest reliability of baseline cognitive assessments using ImPACT.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):47-53. doi: 10.1177/0363546509343805. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
4
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
7
Sensitivity of the concussion assessment battery.
Neurosurgery. 2007 Jun;60(6):1050-7; discussion 1057-8. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255479.90999.C0.
8
Sources of error in computerized neuropsychological assessment.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22 Suppl 1:S39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.10.004. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
The "value added" of neurocognitive testing after sports-related concussion.
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1630-5. doi: 10.1177/0363546506288677. Epub 2006 Jun 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验