• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗分配的新算法减少了小型试验中的选择偏倚和效能损失。

New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.

作者信息

Hofmeijer J, Anema P C, van der Tweel I

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002
PMID:18177784
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In clinical trials, patients become available for treatment sequentially. Especially in trials with a small number of patients, loss of power may become an important issue, if treatments are not allocated equally or if prognostic factors differ between the treatment groups. We present a new algorithm for sequential allocation of two treatments in small clinical trials, which is concerned with the reduction of both selection bias and imbalance.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

With the algorithm, an element of chance is added to the treatment as allocated by minimization. The amount of chance depends on the actual amount of imbalance of treatment allocations of the patients already enrolled. The sensitivity to imbalance may be tuned. We performed trial simulations with different numbers of patients and prognostic factors, in which we quantified loss of power and selection bias.

RESULTS

With our method, selection bias is smaller than with minimization, and loss of power is lower than with pure randomization or treatment allocation according to a biased coin principle.

CONCLUSION

Our method combines the conflicting aims of reduction of bias by predictability and reduction of loss of power, as a result of imbalance. The method may be of use in small trials.

摘要

目的

在临床试验中,患者是依次进入治疗阶段的。尤其是在患者数量较少的试验中,如果治疗分配不均或各治疗组之间的预后因素不同,效能降低可能会成为一个重要问题。我们提出了一种用于小型临床试验中两种治疗方法顺序分配的新算法,该算法旨在减少选择偏倚和不均衡性。

研究设计与设置

通过该算法,在最小化分配的治疗方案中加入了随机因素。随机因素的量取决于已入组患者治疗分配的实际不均衡程度。对不均衡的敏感度可以进行调整。我们对不同数量的患者和预后因素进行了试验模拟,在模拟中对效能降低和选择偏倚进行了量化。

结果

使用我们的方法,选择偏倚比最小化方法小,效能降低比单纯随机化或根据偏倚硬币原则进行治疗分配更低。

结论

我们的方法将通过可预测性减少偏倚和因不均衡性导致的效能降低这两个相互冲突的目标结合起来。该方法可能在小型试验中有用。

相似文献

1
New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.用于治疗分配的新算法减少了小型试验中的选择偏倚和效能损失。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
2
Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.Studywise 最小化:一种改善处理组间平衡并使分配不可预测的处理分配方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;63(10):1118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
3
Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.通过不等分块随机化分配的可预测性,开发了用于评估选择偏倚的量化方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.008.
4
Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验中随机分配方法的统计学比较。
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Dec;25(6):572-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.08.004.
5
Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.最小化随机分组法用于不均衡治疗分配。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 30;28(27):3329-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3710.
6
IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.IRINI:多个预后因素的随机分组。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.12.009. Epub 2010 Dec 25.
7
Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.骨科试验中的随机化程序。
Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):834-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
8
Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.具有后验约束的随机化:描述与性质
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 30;26(27):5033-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.2953.
9
Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.急性中风临床试验中治疗分配的分层与适应性方法比较
Stat Med. 2003 Mar 15;22(5):705-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.1366.
10
Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).犬猫平行组对照临床试验中选择偏倚的控制:97项试验(2000 - 2005年)
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Sep 15;229(6):990-3. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.6.990.

引用本文的文献

1
Interferon β-1a ring prophylaxis to reduce household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cluster randomised clinical trial.干扰素β-1a环状预防措施以减少严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的家庭传播:一项整群随机临床试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 20;62:102082. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102082. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Covariate-constrained randomization for cluster randomized trials in the long-term care setting: Application to the TRAIN-AD trial.长期护理环境中整群随机试验的协变量受限随机化:在TRAIN-AD试验中的应用
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Mar 17;18:100558. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100558. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Internet-based treatment for Romanian adults with panic disorder: protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing a Skype-guided with an unguided self-help intervention (the PAXPD study).
针对罗马尼亚成年惊恐障碍患者的基于互联网的治疗:一项随机对照试验的方案,比较Skype引导的自助干预与无引导的自助干预(PAXPD研究)
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 14;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0709-9.
4
Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials: A report from the Working Group of International Congress of Interventional Neurology.急性缺血性卒中患者的血管内治疗:IMS III、MR RESCUE及SYNTHESIS EXPANSION试验的意义与解读:国际介入神经病学大会工作组报告
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2014 May;7(1):56-75.
5
Intervention versus standard medical treatment in patients with symptomatic occlusion of the internal carotid artery: a randomised oxygen-15 PET study.症状性颈内动脉闭塞患者的介入治疗与标准药物治疗:一项随机氧-15 PET 研究。
EJNMMI Res. 2013 Dec 5;3(1):79. doi: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-79.
6
Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review.在整群随机试验中,对基线平衡的分配技术:方法学综述。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:120. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-120.
7
Statistical issues in the use of dynamic allocation methods for balancing baseline covariates.在使用动态分配方法平衡基线协变量时的统计问题。
Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1711-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.157. Epub 2011 May 3.
8
Quantifying the cost in power of ignoring continuous covariate imbalances in clinical trial randomization.量化临床试验随机分组中忽略连续协变量不均衡所带来的效能损失。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Mar;32(2):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
9
The effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program tailored for women on their perceptions of health: a randomized clinical trial.针对女性的心脏康复计划对其健康感知的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 Jan-Feb;31(1):25-34. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181f68acc.
10
The effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program tailored for women on global quality of life: a randomized clinical trial.针对女性定制的心脏康复计划对全球生活质量的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Nov;19(11):1977-85. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1937. Epub 2010 Sep 16.