• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享奖励困境。

The shared reward dilemma.

作者信息

Cuesta J A, Jiménez R, Lugo H, Sánchez A

机构信息

Grupo Interdisciplinar de Sistemas Complejos (GISC), Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganés, Spain.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2008 Mar 21;251(2):253-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.022. Epub 2007 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.022
PMID:18177899
Abstract

One of the most direct human mechanisms of promoting cooperation is rewarding it. We study the effect of sharing a reward among cooperators in the most stringent form of social dilemma, namely the prisoner's dilemma (PD). Specifically, for a group of players that collect payoffs by playing a pairwise PD game with their partners, we consider an external entity that distributes a fixed reward equally among all cooperators. Thus, individuals confront a new dilemma: on the one hand, they may be inclined to choose the shared reward despite the possibility of being exploited by defectors; on the other hand, if too many players do that, cooperators will obtain a poor reward and defectors will outperform them. By appropriately tuning the amount to be shared a vast variety of scenarios arises, including the traditional ones in the study of cooperation as well as more complex situations where unexpected behavior can occur. We provide a complete classification of the equilibria of the n-player game as well as of its evolutionary dynamics.

摘要

促进合作最直接的人类机制之一就是给予奖励。我们在社会困境最严格的形式,即囚徒困境(PD)中,研究在合作者之间分享奖励的效果。具体而言,对于一组通过与伙伴进行两两囚徒困境博弈来获取收益的玩家,我们考虑一个外部实体,它将固定奖励平均分配给所有合作者。因此,个体面临一个新的困境:一方面,尽管可能被背叛者利用,他们可能仍倾向于选择共享奖励;另一方面,如果太多玩家这样做,合作者将获得较差的奖励,而背叛者的表现将优于他们。通过适当地调整共享的数量,会出现各种各样的情况,包括合作研究中的传统情况以及可能出现意外行为的更复杂情况。我们提供了n人博弈均衡及其进化动力学的完整分类。

相似文献

1
The shared reward dilemma.共享奖励困境。
J Theor Biol. 2008 Mar 21;251(2):253-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.11.022. Epub 2007 Nov 22.
2
Emergence and resilience of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma via a reward mechanism.通过奖励机制实现空间囚徒困境中合作的出现与恢复力
J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 7;250(3):475-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
3
Green-beard effect predicts the evolution of traitorousness in the two-tag Prisoner's dilemma.绿须效应预测了双标签囚徒困境中背叛行为的演化。
J Theor Biol. 2011 Nov 7;288:84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.023. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
4
Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on evolving random networks.演化随机网络上的进化囚徒困境
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Apr;89(4):042142. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042142. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
5
On the coexistence of cooperators,defectors and conditional cooperators in the multiplayer iterated Prisoner's Dilemma.在多人重复囚徒困境中合作者、背叛者和条件合作者的共存。
J Theor Biol. 2012 May 7;300:299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.003.
6
Generous cooperators can outperform non-generous cooperators when replacing a population of defectors.在替换一群背叛者时,慷慨的合作者比不慷慨的合作者表现更出色。
Theor Popul Biol. 2010 Jun;77(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
7
Effects of punishment in a mobile population playing the prisoner's dilemma game.惩罚对参与囚徒困境博弈的流动人群的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Dec;84(6 Pt 2):066115. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.066115. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
8
Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations.有限种群中合作的出现与进化稳定性
Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):646-50. doi: 10.1038/nature02414.
9
Impact of social reward on the evolution of cooperation in voluntary prisoner's dilemma.社会奖励对自愿囚徒困境中合作演变的影响
Biosystems. 2023 Jan;223:104821. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104821. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
10
Evolution of extortion in structured populations.结构化种群中勒索行为的演变。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Feb;89(2):022804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.022804. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Stochastic evolutionary voluntary public goods game with punishment in a Quasi-birth-and-death process.具有惩罚机制的拟生灭过程中随机演化的自愿公共品博弈。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 23;7(1):16110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16140-8.
2
Editorial: Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior in Economic Games.社论:经济博弈中的亲社会与反社会行为
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Dec 26;10:243. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00243. eCollection 2016.
3
First carrot, then stick: how the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation.先胡萝卜,后大棒:激励措施的适应性混合如何促进合作。
J R Soc Interface. 2015 Jan 6;12(102):20140935. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0935.
4
The evolution of anti-social rewarding and its countermeasures in public goods games.公共物品博弈中反社会奖励行为的演变及其对策
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 7;282(1798):20141994. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1994.
5
Optimal distribution of incentives for public cooperation in heterogeneous interaction environments.异构交互环境中公共合作激励措施的最优分配
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jul 23;8:248. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00248. eCollection 2014.