Schilling Elizabeth A, Aseltine Robert H, Gore Susan
Institute for Public Health Research, University of Connecticut Health Center, East Hartford, CT 06108, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Mar;66(5):1140-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.023. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
Research studies investigating the impact of childhood cumulative adversity on adult mental health have proliferated in recent years. In general, little attention has been paid to the operationalization of cumulative adversity, with most studies operationalizing this as the simple sum of the number of occurrences of distinct events experienced. In addition, the possibility that the mathematical relationship of cumulative childhood adversity to some mental health dimensions may be more complex than a basic linear association has not often been considered. This study explores these issues with 2 waves of data drawn from an economically and racially diverse sample transitioning to adulthood in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. A diverse set of childhood adversities were reported in high school and 3 mental health outcomes -- depressed mood, drug use, and antisocial behavior -- were reported 2 years later during the transition to adulthood. Our results suggest that both operationalization and statistical modeling are important and interrelated and, as such, they have the potential to influence substantive interpretation of the effect of cumulative childhood adversity on adult mental health. In our data, total cumulative childhood adversity was related to depressive symptoms, drug use, and antisocial behavior in a positive curvilinear manner with incremental impact increasing as adversities accumulate, but further analysis revealed that this curvilinear effect was an artifact of the confounding of high cumulative adversity scores with the experience of more severe events. Thus, respondents with higher cumulative adversity had disproportionately poorer mental health because of the severity of the adversities they were exposed to, not the cumulative number of different types of adversities experienced. These results indicate that public health efforts targeting prevention of childhood adversities would best be aimed at the most severe adversities in order to have greatest benefit to mental health in young adulthood.
近年来,研究童年累积逆境对成人心理健康影响的研究大量涌现。总体而言,很少有人关注累积逆境的操作化,大多数研究将其简单地定义为所经历的不同事件发生次数的总和。此外,童年累积逆境与某些心理健康维度之间的数学关系可能比基本的线性关联更为复杂,这种可能性也很少被考虑。本研究利用从美国马萨诸塞州波士顿一个经济和种族多样的样本中获取的两波数据,探讨了这些问题。在高中阶段报告了一系列不同的童年逆境,两年后在向成年过渡期间报告了三种心理健康结果——抑郁情绪、药物使用和反社会行为。我们的结果表明,操作化和统计建模都很重要且相互关联,因此,它们有可能影响对童年累积逆境对成人心理健康影响的实质性解释。在我们的数据中,童年累积逆境总量与抑郁症状、药物使用和反社会行为呈正曲线相关,随着逆境的累积,影响逐渐增加,但进一步分析表明,这种曲线效应是高累积逆境分数与更严重事件经历混淆的产物。因此,累积逆境较高的受访者心理健康状况较差,是因为他们所经历的逆境严重程度,而非所经历的不同类型逆境的累积数量。这些结果表明,针对预防童年逆境的公共卫生努力最好针对最严重的逆境,以便对青年期的心理健康产生最大益处。