Faust Miriam, Ben-Artzi Elisheva, Harel Itay
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, 52900 Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Brain Lang. 2008 Jun;105(3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
Previous research suggests that the left hemisphere (LH) focuses on strongly related word meanings; the right hemisphere (RH) may contribute uniquely to the processing of lexical ambiguity by activating and maintaining a wide range of meanings, including subordinate meanings. The present study used the word-lists false memory paradigm [Roediger, H. L. III., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.] to examine whether these differences between the two cerebral hemispheres in semantic processing also affect memory representations for different meanings of ambiguous words. Specifically, we tested the differences between the LH and RH in recollecting unpresented, semantically related, ambiguous words following the presentation of lists of words all related to either the dominant or the subordinate meanings of these ambiguous words. Findings showed that for the unpresented ambiguous words, the LH made more false alarms than the RH for the dominant lists, whereas the opposite pattern emerged for subordinate lists. Moreover, d' analyses showed that, whereas the LH was more sensitive to subordinate than dominant meanings, the RH showed no differences in sensitivity for the two types of word-lists. Taken as a whole, these results support the RH coarse semantic coding theory [Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In Beeman & M., Chiarello, C. (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512-518.] indicating that during word recognition, the RH activates and maintains a broader and less differentiated range of related meanings than the LH, including both dominant and subordinate meanings of ambiguous words. Furthermore, the findings suggest that hemispheric differences in ambiguity resolution during language processing extend also to verbal memory.
先前的研究表明,左半球(LH)专注于紧密相关的词义;右半球(RH)可能通过激活并维持包括从属意义在内的广泛意义,在词汇歧义处理中发挥独特作用。本研究采用词表错误记忆范式[罗迪格三世,H. L.,& 麦克德莫特,K. B.(1995年)。创造错误记忆:记住未在词表中呈现的单词。《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,21,803 - 814。]来检验大脑两半球在语义处理上的这些差异是否也会影响歧义单词不同意义的记忆表征。具体而言,我们测试了在呈现与这些歧义单词的主导或从属意义相关的单词列表后,左半球和右半球在回忆未呈现的、语义相关的歧义单词方面的差异。研究结果表明,对于未呈现的歧义单词,在主导词表中,左半球比右半球产生更多的错误警报,而在从属词表中则出现相反的模式。此外,d' 分析表明,虽然左半球对从属意义比主导意义更敏感,但右半球对这两种类型的词表在敏感性上没有差异。总体而言,这些结果支持右半球粗略语义编码理论[比曼,M.(1998年)。粗略语义编码与语篇理解。载于比曼,M.,& 基亚雷洛,C.(编),《右半球语言理解:认知神经科学视角》(第255 - 284页)。新泽西州马哈瓦:埃尔拉姆;荣 - 比曼,M.(2005年)。理解自然语言的双侧大脑过程。《认知科学趋势》,9,512 - 518。],该理论表明在单词识别过程中,右半球比左半球激活并维持更广泛且区分度更低的相关意义范围,包括歧义单词的主导和从属意义。此外,研究结果表明语言处理过程中半球在歧义消解上的差异也延伸到了言语记忆。