• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于癌症患者的艾伯塔突破性疼痛评估工具:一项采用德尔菲法和患者出声思考访谈的验证研究。

The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: a validation study using a delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews.

作者信息

Hagen Neil A, Stiles Carla, Nekolaichuk Cheryl, Biondo Patricia, Carlson Linda E, Fisher Kim, Fainsinger Robin

机构信息

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Feb;35(2):136-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.016. Epub 2008 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.016
PMID:18178370
Abstract

Breakthrough pain is a prevalent cancer pain syndrome, and research is needed to identify more effective interventions to manage it. A validated tool to assess breakthrough pain in a standard and reliable manner is urgently needed to support the conduct of clinical trials in breakthrough pain. To address this need, we developed a breakthrough pain assessment tool for research purposes. The current study was undertaken to gather validity evidence for this breakthrough pain assessment tool, using a Delphi process involving an expert panel review, followed by a think-aloud process involving patients with cancer-related breakthrough pain. Two expert panels were formed: a national panel (within Canada; n=16) and an international panel (including experts from North America, UK, Europe, the Middle East, Australia, and New Zealand; n=22). Each panel participated in one anonymous survey round. Response rates were 56% (national panel) and 73% (international panel). The Delphi process revealed substantial consensus on the content of the tool, which increased between rounds of review. The overall level of agreement with the tool, averaged over the four evaluated aspects of all items, was 80% among national panelists and 88% among international panelists. Nine patients completed the think-aloud study. They were able to understand and complete the tool and provided specific direction on its improvement. The validity evidence gathered in this study suggests the Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool is conceptually grounded and is understandable by patients and clinicians. Further validation of this tool as an assessment measure within clinical trials research is warranted.

摘要

爆发性疼痛是一种常见的癌症疼痛综合征,需要开展研究以确定更有效的干预措施来进行管理。迫切需要一种经过验证的工具,以便以标准且可靠的方式评估爆发性疼痛,从而支持爆发性疼痛的临床试验。为满足这一需求,我们开发了一种用于研究目的的爆发性疼痛评估工具。本研究旨在通过德尔菲法收集该爆发性疼痛评估工具的效度证据,首先进行专家小组评审,随后对患有癌症相关性爆发性疼痛的患者进行出声思维过程。组建了两个专家小组:一个是国内小组(加拿大境内;n = 16),另一个是国际小组(包括来自北美、英国、欧洲、中东、澳大利亚和新西兰的专家;n = 22)。每个小组都参与了一轮匿名调查。回复率分别为56%(国内小组)和73%(国际小组)。德尔菲法显示,专家们对该工具的内容达成了高度共识,且在各轮评审之间有所增加。在所有项目的四个评估方面进行平均后,国内小组成员对该工具的总体认同度为80%,国际小组成员为88%。九名患者完成了出声思维研究。他们能够理解并完成该工具,并就其改进提供了具体指导。本研究收集的效度证据表明,艾伯塔爆发性疼痛评估工具在概念上有依据,患者和临床医生都能理解。有必要在临床试验研究中进一步验证该工具作为一种评估手段的有效性。

相似文献

1
The Alberta Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool for cancer patients: a validation study using a delphi process and patient think-aloud interviews.用于癌症患者的艾伯塔突破性疼痛评估工具:一项采用德尔菲法和患者出声思考访谈的验证研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 Feb;35(2):136-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.016. Epub 2008 Jan 7.
2
Pain assessment tools in palliative care: an urgent need for consensus.姑息治疗中的疼痛评估工具:迫切需要达成共识。
Palliat Med. 2008 Dec;22(8):895-903. doi: 10.1177/0269216308095701. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
3
Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: a multiple-method approach to instrument development.测量与疼痛管理相关的医疗服务质量:一种仪器开发的多方法途径。
Nurs Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;59(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181d1a732.
4
Assessment and classification of cancer pain.癌症疼痛的评估与分类
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2009 Mar;3(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283260644.
5
The malignant wound assessment tool: a validation study using a Delphi approach.恶性伤口评估工具:使用德尔菲法进行的验证研究。
Palliat Med. 2009 Apr;23(3):266-73. doi: 10.1177/0269216309102536.
6
Development of a fall-risk checklist using the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲技术制定跌倒风险检查表。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Sep;17(17):2275-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02337.x.
7
Indicators of lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain: survey of an expert panel with the Delphi technique.腰椎关节突关节疼痛的指标:运用德尔菲技术对专家小组的调查
Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;87(10):1348-61. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060329. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
8
Development and validation of the breakthrough pain assessment tool (BAT) in cancer patients.癌症患者突破性疼痛评估工具(BAT)的开发与验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):619-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.10.026. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
9
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
10
Item selection and content validity of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for non-verbal adults.针对非言语表达的成年人的重症监护疼痛观察工具的条目选择与内容效度
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jan;65(1):203-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04847.x. Epub 2008 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and validation of the Pharmacy Services Questionnaire (PSQ) in a Chinese population.药房服务问卷(PSQ)在中国人群中的翻译与验证。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 17;18(1):2527409. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2527409. eCollection 2025.
2
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Tool in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者中突破性疼痛评估工具西班牙语版本的验证
Cureus. 2024 Sep 10;16(9):e69135. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69135. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Breakthrough pain among cancer patients at oncology units in Northern Ethiopia; a multi-center study.
埃塞俄比亚北部肿瘤科室癌症患者的爆发性疼痛;一项多中心研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 9;13:1248921. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1248921. eCollection 2023.
4
Fentanyl in cancer pain management: avoiding hasty judgments and discerning its potential benefits.芬太尼在癌症疼痛管理中的应用:避免仓促判断并识别其潜在益处。
Drugs Context. 2023 Dec 14;12. doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-10-2. eCollection 2023.
5
Breakthrough and Episodic Cancer Pain from a Palliative Care Perspective.突破性和偶发性癌痛的姑息治疗视角。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Nov 30;30(12):10249-10259. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30120746.
6
Knowledge and practice of the management of breakthrough cancer pain among general practitioners providing palliative care in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional survey.中国上海姑息治疗的全科医生对爆发性癌痛管理的知识和实践:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 28;13(9):e073670. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073670.
7
Breakthrough pain and rapid-onset opioids in patients with cancer pain: a narrative review.癌症疼痛患者的爆发痛与快速起效的阿片类药物:一项叙述性综述
J Yeungnam Med Sci. 2024 Jan;41(1):22-29. doi: 10.12701/jyms.2023.00367. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
8
Usability, acceptability, and implementation strategies for the Exercise in Cancer Evaluation and Decision Support (EXCEEDS) algorithm: a Delphi study.癌症评估和决策支持(EXCEEDS)算法的可用性、可接受性和实施策略:一项德尔菲研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Sep;30(9):7407-7418. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07164-6. Epub 2022 May 26.
9
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for stillbirth care research (iCHOOSE Study).为死产护理研究制定核心结局集的方案(iCHOOSE 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):e056629. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056629.
10
Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper.意大利癌症疼痛的当前管理:专家意见文件。
Open Med (Wars). 2021 Dec 6;17(1):34-45. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0393. eCollection 2022.