Suppr超能文献

单中心5年经验:直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的有效性

Effectiveness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction from a 5-year single-center experience.

作者信息

Tadel-Kocjancic Spela, Zorman Simona, Jazbec Anja, Gorjup Vojka, Zorman Darko, Noc Marko

机构信息

Center for Intensive Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jan 15;101(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.07.083. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is currently viewed as the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). This method was introduced in our hospital in 2000. From January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2004, a total of 2,393 consecutive patients with STEMI were admitted (27% transferred from 9 non-PCI hospitals and 31 prehospital emergency units/outpatient clinics). Of these patients, 1,666 (70%) underwent urgent coronary angiography and primary PCI. Platelet glycoprotein llb/llla inhibitors were used in 40% and stent placement, in 78%. Postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow was documented in 86%. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation was used in 6%; mechanical ventilation, in 8.6%; and inotropic drugs/vasopressors, in 15.8%. Mortality rates in patients with Killip's class I or II ranged from 1% to 4.9% without negative influence of ischemic time. In patients with Killip's class III or IV, mortality rates increased from 18% to 54% with increasing ischemic delay up to 6 hours (p = 0.06) and remained at around 40% afterward. Independent predictors of mortality were age (odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.64, p = 0.04), resuscitated cardiac arrest (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.18 to 5.05, p = 0.02), and postprocedural TIMI flow (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.59). Overall mortality rates of patients who underwent a primary PCI strategy from 2000 to 2004 were significantly lower than in the control group of 152 consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis from 1995 to 1996 (6.2% vs 16.4%; p <0.001). In conclusion, introduction of a primary PCI strategy significantly decreased hospital mortality in our unselected group of patients with STEMI compared with the thrombolytic era. Our study further emphasized the importance of shortening myocardial ischemic time, particularly in the presence of severe heart failure on admission.

摘要

目前,直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)被视为ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的首选再灌注策略。该方法于2000年引入我院。从2000年1月1日至2004年12月31日,共收治了2393例连续的STEMI患者(27%从9家非PCI医院及31个院前急救单位/门诊转入)。其中,1666例(70%)接受了紧急冠状动脉造影及直接PCI。40%的患者使用了血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂,78%的患者进行了支架置入。术后心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)3级血流的记录率为86%。6%的患者使用了主动脉内球囊反搏;8.6%的患者使用了机械通气;15.8%的患者使用了正性肌力药物/血管升压药。Killip分级为I级或II级的患者死亡率为1%至4.9%,缺血时间无负面影响。Killip分级为III级或IV级的患者,随着缺血延迟时间延长至6小时,死亡率从18%升至54%(p = 0.06),之后维持在40%左右。死亡率的独立预测因素为年龄(比值比[OR] 1.29,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01至1.64,p = 0.04)、心脏骤停复苏(OR 2.44,95% CI 1.18至5.05,p = 0.02)及术后TIMI血流(OR 0.31,95% CI 0.16至0.59)。2000年至2004年接受直接PCI策略的患者总体死亡率显著低于1995年至1996年接受溶栓治疗的152例连续患者的对照组(6.2%对16.4%;p <0.001)。总之,与溶栓时代相比,直接PCI策略的引入显著降低了我院未选择的STEMI患者的住院死亡率。我们的研究进一步强调了缩短心肌缺血时间的重要性,尤其是在入院时存在严重心力衰竭的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验