Suppr超能文献

评估男性的性体验:性体验问卷的验证

Evaluating the sexual experience in men: validation of the sexual experience questionnaire.

作者信息

Mulhall John P, King Rosie, Kirby Michael, Hvidsten Kyle, Symonds Tara, Bushmakin Andrew G, Cappelleri Joseph C

机构信息

Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):365-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00694.x. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The absence of a single brief measure that assesses function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) hinders evaluation of the sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction (ED).

AIM

To psychometrically analyze the Sexual Experience Questionnaire (SEX-Q).

METHODS

Two data sets were studied. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of flexible-dose sildenafil for ED treatment provided the final clinical trial data set (213 men enrolled, 4 of whom did not receive treatment) and the interim clinical trial data set (190 men screened and 165 men enrolled). The survey data set consisted of 902 respondents to a U.S. community health survey, of whom two-thirds had ED and one-third did not.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality and distribution of responses, comparative fit, item-level discriminant testing, internal consistency (Cronbach alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), known-groups validity (vs. International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] ED severity groups), convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients with scores on the IIEF, Self-Esteem and Relationship [SEAR] questionnaire, and Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ]), responsiveness, and clinically important difference (CID).

RESULTS

The original 15 items were reduced to 12 items in three domains (erection, individual satisfaction, and couple satisfaction), which demonstrated good quality responses for all items; a strong factor structure; excellent internal consistency; good test-retest reliability; clear known-groups validity across the severity groups; moderate to strong convergent validity against the IIEF, SEAR, and QEQ; and high treatment responsiveness. The estimated CID ranged from 16.0 to 22.3 across domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The SEX-Q is the first questionnaire to solely and exclusively combine functional and HRQoL concepts (erection, individual satisfaction, and couple satisfaction domains) in a brief questionnaire, which allows a more focused and less burdensome evaluation of the sexual experience, making it a potentially useful measure for clinical trial research.

摘要

引言

缺乏一种能评估性功能及健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的简短单一测量方法,这阻碍了对勃起功能障碍(ED)男性性体验的评估。

目的

对性体验问卷(SEX-Q)进行心理测量学分析。

方法

研究了两个数据集。一项关于灵活剂量西地那非治疗ED的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验提供了最终临床试验数据集(共纳入213名男性,其中4名未接受治疗)和中期临床试验数据集(190名男性接受筛查,165名男性被纳入)。调查数据集包括902名参与美国社区健康调查的受访者,其中三分之二患有ED,三分之一没有。

主要观察指标

回答的质量和分布、比较拟合度、项目层面的判别测试、内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)、重测信度(组内相关系数)、已知群体效度(与勃起功能国际指数[IIEF]的ED严重程度分组相比)、收敛效度(与IIEF、自尊与关系[SEAR]问卷及勃起质量问卷[QEQ]得分的皮尔逊相关系数)、反应性及临床重要差异(CID)。

结果

最初的15个项目缩减为三个领域(勃起、个人满意度和伴侣满意度)的12个项目,所有项目的回答质量良好;具有强大的因子结构;内部一致性极佳;重测信度良好;在不同严重程度分组间已知群体效度明确;与IIEF、SEAR和QEQ相比具有中度到高度的收敛效度;治疗反应性高。各领域估计的CID范围为16.0至22.3。

结论

SEX-Q是首个在简短问卷中单独且专门结合功能和HRQoL概念(勃起、个人满意度和伴侣满意度领域)的问卷,它能对性体验进行更有针对性且负担较小的评估,使其成为临床试验研究中一种潜在有用的测量方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验