Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征指南推荐的药物和介入治疗使用方面的年龄差异:一项队列研究

Age-related differences in the use of guideline-recommended medical and interventional therapies for acute coronary syndromes: a cohort study.

作者信息

Schoenenberger Andreas W, Radovanovic Dragana, Stauffer Jean-Christophe, Windecker Stephan, Urban Philip, Eberli Franz R, Stuck Andreas E, Gutzwiller Felix, Erne Paul

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Inselspital University of Bern Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Mar;56(3):510-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01589.x. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of guideline-recommended medical and interventional therapies in older and younger patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Fifty-five hospitals in Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

Eleven thousand nine hundred thirty-two patients with ACS enrolled between March 1, 2001, and June 30, 2006. ACS definition included ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina pectoris (UA).

MEASUREMENTS

Use of medical and interventional therapies was determined after exclusion of patients with contraindications and after adjustment for comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) per year increase in age.

RESULTS

Elderly patients were less likely to receive acetylsalicylic acid (OR=0.976, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.969-0.980) or beta-blockers (OR=0.985, 95% CI=0.981-0.989). No age-dependent difference was found for heparin use. Elderly patients with STEMI were less likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolysis (OR=0.955, 95% CI=0.949-0.961). Elderly patients with NSTEMI or UA less often underwent PCI (OR=0.943, 95% CI=0.937-0.949).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients across the whole spectrum of ACS were less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies, even after adequate adjustment for comorbidities. Prognosis of elderly patients with ACS may be improved by increasing adherence to guideline-recommended medical and interventional therapies.

摘要

目的

比较老年和年轻急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者使用指南推荐的药物和介入治疗的情况。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

瑞士的55家医院。

参与者

2001年3月1日至2006年6月30日期间登记的11932例ACS患者。ACS的定义包括ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UA)。

测量

在排除有禁忌证的患者并对合并症进行调整后,确定药物和介入治疗的使用情况。使用多变量逻辑回归模型计算年龄每增加一岁的比值比(OR)。

结果

老年患者接受阿司匹林(OR=0.976,95%置信区间(CI)=0.969-0.980)或β受体阻滞剂(OR=0.985,95%CI=0.981-0.989)的可能性较小。肝素使用方面未发现年龄依赖性差异。STEMI老年患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或溶栓治疗的可能性较小(OR=0.955,95%CI=0.949-0.961)。NSTEMI或UA老年患者接受PCI的频率较低(OR=0.943,95%CI=0.937-0.949)。

结论

即使在对合并症进行充分调整后,整个ACS范围内的老年患者接受指南推荐治疗的可能性仍较小。通过提高对指南推荐的药物和介入治疗的依从性,可能改善ACS老年患者的预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验