Hess D C, Borlongan C V
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Cell Prolif. 2008 Feb;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):94-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2008.00486.x.
Cells of the central nervous system were once thought to be incapable of regeneration. This dogma has been challenged in the last decade with studies showing new, migrating stem cells in the brain in many rodent injury models and findings of new neurones in the human hippocampus in adults. Moreover, there are reports of bone marrow-derived cells developing neuronal and vascular phenotypes and aiding in repair of injured brain. These findings have fuelled excitement and interest in regenerative medicine for neurological diseases, arguably the most difficult diseases to treat. There are numerous proposed regenerative approaches to neurological diseases. These include cell therapy approaches in which cells are delivered intracerebrally or are infused by an intravenous or intra-arterial route; stem cell mobilization approaches in which endogenous stem and progenitor cells are mobilized by cytokines such as granulocyte colony stimulatory factor (GCSF) or chemokines such as SDF-1; trophic and growth factor support, such as delivering brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) into the brain to support injured neurones; these approaches may be used together to maximize recovery. While initially, it was thought that cell therapy might work by a 'cell replacement' mechanism, a large body of evidence is emerging that cell therapy works by providing trophic or 'chaperone' support to the injured tissue and brain. Angiogenesis and neurogenesis are coupled in the brain. Increasing angiogenesis with adult stem cell approaches in rodent models of stroke leads to preservation of neurones and improved functional outcome. A number of stem and progenitor cell types has been proposed as therapy for neurological disease ranging from neural stem cells to bone marrow derived stem cells to embryonic stem cells. Any cell therapy approach to neurological disease will have to be scalable and easily commercialized if it will have the necessary impact on public health. Currently, bone marrow-derived cell populations such as the marrow stromal cell, multipotential progenitor cells, umbilical cord stem cells and neural stem cells meet these criteria the best. Of great clinical significance, initial evidence suggests these cell types may be delivered by an allogeneic approach, so strict tissue matching may not be necessary. The most immediate impact on patients will be achieved by making use of the trophic support capability of cell therapy and not by a cell replacement mechanism.
中枢神经系统的细胞曾被认为无法再生。在过去十年中,这一教条受到了挑战,许多啮齿动物损伤模型的研究显示大脑中有新的、正在迁移的干细胞,并且在成人大脑海马体中发现了新的神经元。此外,有报道称骨髓来源的细胞可发育出神经元和血管表型,并有助于受损大脑的修复。这些发现激发了人们对神经疾病再生医学的兴奋和兴趣,神经疾病可谓是最难治疗的疾病。针对神经疾病有许多提出的再生方法。这些方法包括细胞治疗方法,即将细胞脑内递送或通过静脉或动脉途径注入;干细胞动员方法,即通过粒细胞集落刺激因子(GCSF)等细胞因子或SDF-1等趋化因子动员内源性干细胞和祖细胞;营养和生长因子支持,如将脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)或胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)递送至大脑以支持受损神经元;这些方法可一起使用以最大化恢复效果。虽然最初认为细胞治疗可能通过“细胞替代”机制起作用,但大量证据表明细胞治疗是通过为受损组织和大脑提供营养或“伴侣”支持而起作用。大脑中的血管生成和神经发生是相互关联的。在啮齿动物中风模型中,用成体干细胞方法增加血管生成可导致神经元的保存和功能结果的改善。从神经干细胞到骨髓来源的干细胞再到胚胎干细胞,许多干细胞和祖细胞类型已被提议用于治疗神经疾病。如果要对公众健康产生必要影响,任何针对神经疾病的细胞治疗方法都必须具有可扩展性且易于商业化。目前,骨髓来源的细胞群体,如骨髓基质细胞、多能祖细胞、脐带干细胞和神经干细胞最符合这些标准。具有重大临床意义的是,初步证据表明这些细胞类型可以通过同种异体方法递送,因此可能无需严格的组织匹配。利用细胞治疗的营养支持能力而非细胞替代机制将对患者产生最直接的影响。