Qian Y-F, Yu C-L, Zhang C, Yu Y-Q
Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Apr;29(4):701-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0907. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
T1-weighted inversion recovery (T1IR) imaging demonstrates higher brain tissue contrast and is more sensitive to contrast enhancement than T1-weighted spin-echo (T1SE) imaging. However, the effectiveness of the 2 imaging sequences in detecting brain metastases has not been studied. The objective of this report was to determine which sequence should be used for detecting brain metastases by comparing the effectiveness of T1IR imaging with that of T1SE imaging.
Thirty-one patients with brain metastases underwent T1SE and T1IR with and without intravenous gadopentetate dimeglumine. T1SE and T1IR images were compared for the number of metastases, degree of contrast enhancement, volume and contrast-to-enhancement ratio (CER) of tumors, and contrast ratio (CR) of tumor to white matter (WM), tumor to gray matter (GM), and tumor to CSF.
There were 352 metastases in 31 patients, among which 2 patients with 5 metastases were demonstrated only on postenhanced T1SE images. Pre-enhanced and postenhanced T1SE images detected 162 and 350 lesions, respectively, whereas pre-enhanced and postenhanced T1IR images only discovered 94 and 233 lesions. The degree of tumor contrast enhancement was higher on T1IR images than on T1SE images, whereas no difference in the CER of tumors was found between the 2 sequences. Before enhancement, all of the CRs on T1IR images were higher than on T1SE images. After contrast enhancement, CRs of tumor to WM and tumor to GM were higher on T1SE images than on T1IR images. On the contrary, the CR of tumor to CSF was higher on T1IR images than on T1SE images. Tumor volumes were 5.6 +/- 7.0 cm(3) on postenhanced T1SE images and 5.5 +/- 7.0 cm(3) on postenhanced T1IR images, and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups.
T1SE, but not T1IR, should be used as T1-weighted imaging in detecting brain metastases, because T1SE imaging has a greater sensitivity than T1IR imaging both before and after contrast material administration.
与T1加权自旋回波(T1SE)成像相比,T1加权反转恢复(T1IR)成像显示出更高的脑组织对比度,并且对对比增强更敏感。然而,尚未研究这两种成像序列在检测脑转移瘤方面的有效性。本报告的目的是通过比较T1IR成像与T1SE成像的有效性,确定应使用哪种序列来检测脑转移瘤。
31例脑转移瘤患者接受了T1SE和T1IR检查,包括有无静脉注射钆喷酸葡胺的情况。比较T1SE和T1IR图像上转移瘤的数量、对比增强程度、肿瘤体积和对比增强率(CER),以及肿瘤与白质(WM)、肿瘤与灰质(GM)和肿瘤与脑脊液的对比率(CR)。
31例患者共有352个转移瘤,其中2例患者的5个转移瘤仅在增强后的T1SE图像上显示。增强前和增强后的T1SE图像分别检测到162个和350个病灶,而增强前和增强后的T1IR图像仅发现94个和233个病灶。T1IR图像上肿瘤对比增强程度高于T1SE图像,而两种序列之间肿瘤的CER没有差异。增强前,T1IR图像上所有的CR均高于T1SE图像。对比增强后,T1SE图像上肿瘤与WM和肿瘤与GM的CR高于T1IR图像。相反,T1IR图像上肿瘤与脑脊液的CR高于T1SE图像。增强后T1SE图像上肿瘤体积为5.6±7.0 cm³,增强后T1IR图像上肿瘤体积为5.5±7.0 cm³,两组之间无显著差异。
在检测脑转移瘤时,应使用T1SE而非T1IR作为T1加权成像,因为在注射对比剂前后,T1SE成像比T1IR成像具有更高的敏感性。