Oosterink Floor M D, de Jongh Ad, Aartman Irene H A
Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioural Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Feb;116(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00500.x.
Relatively little is known about the anxiety-provoking capacity of the various objects and situations characteristic of the dental setting. The aims of the current study were to establish a hierarchy of anxiety-provoking capacities of a large set of dental stimuli and to determine the differences in relation to gender, age, ethnicity, and level of dental trait anxiety. An additional aim was to derive an estimate of the number of stimuli to be presented to anxious patients in order to obtain full coverage of their dental fears. A questionnaire describing 67 potentially anxiety-provoking stimuli was constructed and presented to 960 adults. The results indicated that invasive stimuli (e.g. surgical procedures) were rated as the most anxiety provoking and that non-invasive stimuli (e.g. the dentist as a person) were the least anxiety provoking. The fear-evoking capacity of the dental stimuli varied with gender, age, ethnicity, and level of dental trait anxiety, whereas the rank order of these stimuli appeared to be independent of these factors. Furthermore, it appeared that the top 25 most anxiety-provoking objects and situations found in the current study contained only eight (28%) stimuli, which had been taken into account in previous research. The present findings support the need for assessment procedures using a broad spectrum of potentially anxiety-provoking stimuli.
对于牙科环境中各种典型物体和情境引发焦虑的能力,我们了解得相对较少。本研究的目的是建立一大组牙科刺激物引发焦虑能力的等级体系,并确定在性别、年龄、种族和牙科特质焦虑水平方面的差异。另一个目的是估计向焦虑患者呈现的刺激物数量,以便全面涵盖他们的牙科恐惧。构建了一份描述67种潜在引发焦虑刺激物的问卷,并向960名成年人发放。结果表明,侵入性刺激(如外科手术)被评为最易引发焦虑,而非侵入性刺激(如牙医个人)最不易引发焦虑。牙科刺激物引发恐惧的能力随性别、年龄、种族和牙科特质焦虑水平而变化,而这些刺激物的等级顺序似乎与这些因素无关。此外,在本研究中发现的最易引发焦虑的25种物体和情境中,只有8种(28%)刺激物在先前研究中被考虑到。本研究结果支持使用广泛的潜在引发焦虑刺激物进行评估程序的必要性。