追寻医疗保健中的质量与安全。
On the trail of quality and safety in health care.
作者信息
Grol Richard, Berwick Donald M, Wensing Michel
机构信息
Centre for Quality of Care Research (WOK), PO Box 9101, 114, 6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands.
出版信息
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):74-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39413.486944.AD.
Abstract
Initiatives to improve patient care have had only limited success. , , and call for steps to encourage a new generation of researchers to investigate how to speed up progress
摘要
改善患者护理的举措仅取得了有限的成功。……并呼吁采取措施鼓励新一代研究人员探索如何加快进展。 （注：原文中“Initiatives to improve patient care have had only limited success.”之后有省略内容未给出，这里按完整逻辑翻译，但省略部分无法准确翻译）
相似文献
1
On the trail of quality and safety in health care.追寻医疗保健中的质量与安全。
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):74-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39413.486944.AD.
2
The end of the beginning: the strategic approach to patient safety research.开端的结束：患者安全研究的战略方法
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):3-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.3.
3
Patient safety research: shaping the European agenda.患者安全研究：塑造欧洲议程。
Clin Med (Lond). 2009 Apr;9(2):145-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.9-2-145.
4
Identifying violation-provoking conditions in a healthcare setting.识别医疗环境中引发违规行为的条件。
Ergonomics. 2008 Nov;51(11):1625-42. doi: 10.1080/00140130802331617.
5
IOM releases report on patient safety.美国医学研究所发布关于患者安全的报告。
J Investig Med. 2001 May;49(3):222-3. doi: 10.2310/6650.2001.33964.
6
Patient safety and quality improvement: a policy assessment.患者安全与质量改进：一项政策评估。
Clin Lab Sci. 2010 Fall;23(4):212-8.
7
Senate HELP committee holds hearing on patient safety.
Hosp Outlook. 2001 Jul;4(5):4.
8
Patient safety. The journey to safety.
Health Serv J. 2003 Nov 13;113(5881):suppl 1.
9
Checklists and patient safety.
Ir Med J. 2009 Sep;102(8):244.
10
Would criminalising healthcare professionals for wilful neglect improve patient care?将故意疏忽的医疗保健专业人员定为犯罪会改善患者护理吗？
BMJ. 2014 Jan 23;348:g133. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g133.
引用本文的文献
1
'Don't freak out if you get a letter saying cancer patient pathways!': Communication work between different demands in cancer care.“如果你收到一封写着‘癌症患者路径！’的信，不要惊慌！”：癌症护理中不同需求之间的沟通工作。
Health (London). 2024 Mar;28(2):313-330. doi: 10.1177/13634593221127819. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Development of targeted, theory-informed interventions to improve bronchiolitis management.开发以目标为导向、基于理论的干预措施，以改善毛细支气管炎的管理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug 3;21(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06724-6.
3
PARTNER: a service delivery model to implement optimal primary care management of people with knee osteoarthritis: description of development.合作伙伴：实施膝关节骨关节炎患者最佳初级保健管理的服务交付模式：开发描述。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 7;10(10):e040423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040423.
4
An inductive exploration of the implementation knowledge of research funders.研究资助者实施知识的归纳探索。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 18;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0472-8.
5
Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more.健康知识转化：实施科学如何做出更多贡献
BMC Med. 2019 May 7;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1322-9.
6
Use and Uptake of eHealth in General Practice: A Cross-Sectional Survey and Focus Group Study Among Health Care Users and General Practitioners.电子健康在全科医疗中的使用和接受情况：一项针对医疗保健使用者和全科医生的横断面调查和焦点小组研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Apr 6;4(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4515.
7
Patient safety improvement programmes for primary care. Review of a Delphi procedure and pilot studies by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care.初级保健患者安全改善计划。LINNEAUS初级保健患者安全合作组织对德尔菲法及试点研究的综述
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;21 Suppl(sup1):50-5. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1043725.
8
Evaluation of the fidelity of an interactive face-to-face educational intervention to improve general practitioner management of back pain.评估一种互动式面对面教育干预措施在改善全科医生对背痛管理方面的保真度。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 8;5(7):e007886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007886.
9
Reliability and Validity of the Alberta Context Tool (ACT) with Professional Nurses: Findings from a Multi-Study Analysis.阿尔伯塔情境工具（ACT）在专业护士中的信度与效度：一项多研究分析的结果
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0127405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127405. eCollection 2015.
10
Engaging pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU participatory action research project (PICU-PAR).参与儿科重症监护病房 (PICU) 临床工作人员领导实践改进：PICU 参与式行动研究项目 (PICU-PAR)。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 8;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-6.
本文引用的文献
1
Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study.健康研究资助机构对知识转化的支持与推广：一项国际研究。
Milbank Q. 2008 Mar;86(1):125-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00515.x.
2
Antibiotic prescribing in primary care: first choice and restrictive prescribing are two different traits.基层医疗中的抗生素处方：一线选择处方和限制性处方是两种不同的特性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):105-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018580.
3
Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.规划与研究患者护理的改善：理论视角的运用
Milbank Q. 2007;85(1):93-138. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.
4
U.S. health system performance: a national scorecard.美国卫生系统绩效：一份国家记分卡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w457-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w457. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
5
Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project.迈向关于质量改进的更有力证据。出版物指南草案：共识项目的开端。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):319-25. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787.
6
The John Eisenberg lecture: health services research as a citizen in improvement.约翰·艾森伯格讲座：作为促进健康之力量的卫生服务研究
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):317-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00358.x.
7
Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.服务组织中的创新扩散：系统综述与建议
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.
8
Quality of care in the NHS of England.
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):E288-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7445.E288.
9
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies.指南传播与实施策略的有效性和效率。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Feb;8(6):iii-iv, 1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta8060.
10
Increasing the impact of health services research.增强卫生服务研究的影响力。
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1339-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1339.
Zotero 插件