• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与儿科重症监护病房 (PICU) 临床工作人员领导实践改进:PICU 参与式行动研究项目 (PICU-PAR)。

Engaging pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU participatory action research project (PICU-PAR).

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, 6303 NW Marine Drive, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 8;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-6.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-9-6
PMID:24401288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3896821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the Community of Practice (CoP) model with Participatory Action Research (PAR). This approach aims to mobilize the PICU 'community' as a whole with a focus on practice; namely, to create a 'community of practice' to support reflection, learning, and innovation in everyday work.

METHODOLOGY

An iterative two-stage PAR process using mixed methods has been developed among the PICU CoP to describe the environment (stage 1) and implement specific interventions (stage 2). Stage 1 is ethnographic description of the unit's care practice. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations describe the clinical staff's experiences and perspectives around bedside care and quality endeavors in the PICU. Contrasts and comparisons across participants, time and activities help understanding the PICU culture and experience. Stage 2 is a succession of PAR spirals, using results from phase 1 to set up specific interventions aimed at building the staff's capability to conduct QI projects while acquiring appropriate technical skills and leadership capacity (primary outcome). Team communication, information, and interaction will be enhanced through a knowledge exchange (KE) and a wireless network of iPADs.

RELEVANCE

Lack of leadership at the staff level in order to improve daily practice is a recognized challenge that faces many hospitals. We believe that the PAR approach within a highly motivated CoP is a sound method to create the social dynamic and cultural context within which clinical teams can grow, reflect, innovate and feel proud to better serve patients.

摘要

背景

尽管付出了相当大的努力,让员工在实践环境中领导质量改进活动仍然是一个持续存在的挑战。在不列颠哥伦比亚省儿童医院(BCCH),儿科重症监护病房(PICU)采用了基于实践社区(CoP)模型和参与式行动研究(PAR)的新质量改进阶段。这种方法旨在动员整个 PICU“社区”,重点关注实践,即创建一个“实践社区”,以支持日常工作中的反思、学习和创新。

方法

在 PICU CoP 中已经开发了一种迭代的两阶段 PAR 过程,采用混合方法来描述环境(第 1 阶段)和实施具体干预措施(第 2 阶段)。第 1 阶段是对单位护理实践的民族志描述。调查、访谈、焦点小组和直接观察描述了临床工作人员在 PICU 床边护理和质量工作方面的经验和观点。参与者、时间和活动之间的对比和比较有助于理解 PICU 文化和体验。第 2 阶段是一系列 PAR 螺旋,利用第 1 阶段的结果来制定具体干预措施,旨在建立员工进行质量改进项目的能力,同时获得适当的技术技能和领导能力(主要结果)。通过知识交流(KE)和 iPad 无线网络,将增强团队沟通、信息和互动。

相关性

缺乏基层员工领导能力以改善日常实践是许多医院面临的公认挑战。我们相信,在高度积极的 CoP 中,PAR 方法是一种合理的方法,可以创造出社会动态和文化背景,使临床团队能够成长、反思、创新,并为更好地为患者服务而感到自豪。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/80b1c6a18275/1748-5908-9-6-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/21aa0a543963/1748-5908-9-6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/6dffb5589bdc/1748-5908-9-6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/1c2b43847e0f/1748-5908-9-6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/80b1c6a18275/1748-5908-9-6-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/21aa0a543963/1748-5908-9-6-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/6dffb5589bdc/1748-5908-9-6-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/1c2b43847e0f/1748-5908-9-6-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e972/3896821/80b1c6a18275/1748-5908-9-6-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Engaging pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU participatory action research project (PICU-PAR).参与儿科重症监护病房 (PICU) 临床工作人员领导实践改进:PICU 参与式行动研究项目 (PICU-PAR)。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 8;9:6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-6.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
4
Research as a Standard of Care in the PICU.作为儿科重症监护病房(PICU)护理标准的研究
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):e13-21. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000562.
5
How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation.一线工作人员如何利用患者体验数据来改善服务?一项人种学案例研究评估的结果。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020 Jul;25(3):151-161. doi: 10.1177/1355819619888675. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
Is staff well-being and communication enhanced by multidisciplinary work shift evaluations?多学科工作轮班评估是否能提升员工的幸福感和沟通能力?
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1409-14. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2769-z. Epub 2005 Aug 27.
9
Improved perception of communication and compliance with a revised, intensive care unit-specific bedside communication sheet.对沟通的认知得到改善,并对修订后的重症监护病房专用床边沟通表的依从性提高。
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):578-83. doi: 10.1177/1062860614542420. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
10
Development and Evaluation of I-PASS-to-PICU: A Standard Electronic Template to Improve Referral Communication for Interfacility Transfers to the Pediatric ICU.I-PASS-to-PICU 的制定与评估:改善儿科重症监护室(PICU)机构间转介沟通的标准电子模板。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 May;50(5):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.01.010. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing Management in Pediatric Intensive Care in South Asia.南亚儿科重症监护中的护理管理
Children (Basel). 2025 May 31;12(6):726. doi: 10.3390/children12060726.
2
Mixed methods study protocol for combining stakeholder-led rapid evaluation with near real-time continuous registry data to facilitate evaluations of quality of care in intensive care units.混合方法研究方案:将利益相关者主导的快速评估与近实时连续登记数据相结合,以促进重症监护病房护理质量评估。
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Nov 1;8:29. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18710.3. eCollection 2023.
3
New approach to assessing and addressing moral distress in intensive care unit personnel: a case study.

本文引用的文献

1
Leadership needs to shift in the health system: three emerging perspectives to inform our way forward.卫生系统中的领导力需要转变:三种新出现的观点为我们指明前进方向。
Healthc Pap. 2013;13(1):48-54; discussion 78-82. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23343.
2
Front-line ownership: generating a cure mindset for patient safety.一线主导权:培养关注患者安全的治愈思维模式。
Healthc Pap. 2013;13(1):6-22. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23299.
3
The promise of Lean in health care.精益医疗的承诺。
评估和解决重症监护病房人员道德困境的新方法:案例研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;69(10):1240-1247. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02307-z. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Ethnographic research as an evolving method for supporting healthcare improvement skills: a scoping review.人种学研究作为一种不断发展的方法,用于支持医疗保健改进技能:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01466-9.
5
The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.新生儿重症监护病房研究传播文化:主要利益相关者的观点。
J Perinatol. 2021 Dec;41(12):2826-2833. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01220-5. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
6
Study protocol for evaluating the implementation and effectiveness of an emergency department longitudinal patient monitoring system using a mixed-methods approach.使用混合方法评估急诊科纵向患者监测系统实施情况及有效性的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2014-9.
7
Theoretical domains framework to assess barriers to change for planning health care quality interventions: a systematic literature review.用于评估规划医疗保健质量干预措施变革障碍的理论领域框架:一项系统文献综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Jul 20;9:303-10. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S107796. eCollection 2016.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jan;88(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.025.
4
Designing an implementation strategy to improve interprofessional shared decision making in sciatica: study protocol of the DISC study.设计一项实施策略以改善 sciatica 中的跨专业共享决策:DISC 研究的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jun 15;7:55. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-55.
5
From Toyota to the bedside: nurses can lead the lean way in health care reform.从丰田到病床边:护士能够引领医疗改革中的精益之路。
Nurs Adm Q. 2012 Jul-Sep;36(3):234-42. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e318258c3d5.
6
Video elicitation interviews: a qualitative research method for investigating physician-patient interactions.视频启发式访谈:一种用于调查医患互动的定性研究方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Mar-Apr;10(2):118-25. doi: 10.1370/afm.1339.
7
Complex adaptive systems (CAS): an overview of key elements, characteristics and application to management theory.复杂适应系统(CAS):关键要素、特征及其在管理理论中的应用概述
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(1):33-7. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v19i1.791.
8
The impact of a lean rounding process in a pediatric intensive care unit.精益查房流程对儿科重症监护病房的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):608-17. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232e2fc.
9
Stages of change.改变阶段。
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;67(2):143-54. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20758.
10
Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities.医学教育理论视角:过去的经验与未来的可能。
Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.