Mathur Charu, Stigler Melissa H, Perry Cheryl L, Arora Monika, Reddy K Srinath
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jan;10(1):109-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200701767779.
This study examined whether the distribution of tobacco use and related psychosocial risk factors among youth in urban India vary by socioeconomic status (SES). Data were derived from a cross-sectional survey of students enrolled in the 6th and 8th grades in 32 schools in Delhi and Chennai (N = 11,642). The survey was conducted in 2004, before the implementation of a program designed to prevent and reduce tobacco use (MYTRI). Mixed-effect regression models were used (a) to determine the prevalence of tobacco use among private (higher SES) and government (lower SES) school students, (b) to investigate whether certain psychosocial factors were associated with increased tobacco use, and (c) to determine how these factors varied by school type. Ever-use of multiple forms of tobacco (e.g., gutkha, bidis, and cigarettes) was more prevalent among government school students than private school students. After adjusting for city, gender, grade, and age, we found the prevalence rate for ever-use of any tobacco product to be 18.9% for government school students, compared with 12.2% for private school students (p<.01). Students in government schools scored lower than private school students on most psychosocial risk factors for tobacco use studied here, indicating higher risk. Government school students scored the lowest for refusal skills, self-efficacy, and reasons not to use tobacco. Social susceptibility to chewing tobacco and social susceptibility to smoking were strong correlates of current tobacco use among government school students. Exposure to tobacco advertising was also a strong correlate of current tobacco use for government school students but not private school students. In two large cities of India, students attending government schools are using many forms of tobacco at higher rates than private school students. The psychosocial risk profile of government school students suggests they are more vulnerable to initiation and use and to outside influences that encourage use.
本研究调查了印度城市青少年中烟草使用情况及相关社会心理风险因素的分布是否因社会经济地位(SES)而异。数据来自对德里和金奈32所学校6年级和8年级学生的横断面调查(N = 11,642)。该调查于2004年进行,在一项旨在预防和减少烟草使用的计划(MYTRI)实施之前。使用混合效应回归模型:(a)确定私立学校(较高SES)和政府学校(较低SES)学生中烟草使用的患病率;(b)调查某些社会心理因素是否与烟草使用增加有关;(c)确定这些因素如何因学校类型而异。政府学校学生中多种形式烟草(如古特卡、比迪烟和香烟)的曾经使用率高于私立学校学生。在对城市、性别、年级和年龄进行调整后,我们发现政府学校学生中任何烟草产品的曾经使用率为18.9%,而私立学校学生为12.2%(p <.01)。在此研究的大多数烟草使用社会心理风险因素方面,政府学校学生的得分低于私立学校学生,表明风险更高。政府学校学生在拒绝技巧、自我效能感和不使用烟草的理由方面得分最低。对嚼烟的社会易感性和对吸烟的社会易感性与政府学校学生当前的烟草使用密切相关。接触烟草广告也是政府学校学生当前烟草使用的一个强相关因素,但私立学校学生并非如此。在印度的两个大城市中,就读于政府学校的学生使用多种烟草形式的比率高于私立学校学生。政府学校学生的社会心理风险状况表明,他们更容易开始使用和持续使用烟草,并且更容易受到鼓励使用烟草的外部影响。