• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Procedures and Accuracy of Discontinuous Measurement of Problem Behavior in Common Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis.应用行为分析常见实践中问题行为不连续测量的程序与准确性
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jun 3;13(2):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00361-6. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Minimizing and Reporting Momentary Time-Sampling Measurement Error in Single-Case Research.在单病例研究中最小化并报告瞬时时间抽样测量误差
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jan 17;13(1):247-252. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-00325-2. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Use of discontinuous methods of data collection in behavioral intervention: guidelines for practitioners.行为干预中不连续数据收集方法的使用:从业者指南
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):77-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03391826.
4
A comparison of reliability measures for continuous and discontinuous recording methods: inflated agreement scores with partial interval recording and momentary time sampling for duration events.连续记录法和不连续记录法的可靠性比较:持续时间事件的部分区间记录和瞬时时间抽样会导致过高的一致性评分。
Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):389-402. doi: 10.1177/0145445511405512.
5
Simulation Theory Applied to Direct Systematic Observation.应用于直接系统观察的模拟理论
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 8;8:905. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00905. eCollection 2017.
6
A method for describing preschoolers' activity preferences.一种描述学龄前儿童活动偏好的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):603-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.603-618.
7
Time sampling and measurement error: the effect of interval length and sampling pattern.时间抽样与测量误差:间隔时长与抽样模式的影响
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1985 Sep;16(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(85)90070-9.
8
Taking a closer look: time sampling and measurement error.深入观察:时间采样和测量误差。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Summer;10(2):325-32. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-325.
9
A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial-interval recording for evaluating functional relations.用于评估功能关系的瞬间时间抽样与部分间隔记录的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Fall;40(3):501-14. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-501.
10
Interval sampling methods and measurement error: a computer simulation.间隔抽样方法与测量误差:计算机模拟
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):83-100. doi: 10.1002/jaba.93. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Ins and Outs of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention in Promoting Social Communicative Abilities and Theory of Mind in Children and Adolescents with ASD: A Systematic Review.应用行为分析(ABA)干预对促进自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年社交沟通能力及心理理论的来龙去脉:一项系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;15(6):814. doi: 10.3390/bs15060814.
2
Perceptions of Machine Learning among Therapists Practicing Applied Behavior Analysis: A National Survey.应用行为分析治疗师对机器学习的认知:一项全国性调查。
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 May 23;17(4):1147-1159. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-00936-y. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Comparative Effects of Applied Behavior Analysis on Male and Female Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder.应用行为分析对自闭症谱系障碍男性和女性个体的比较效果。
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59802. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59802. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Examining the Effects of Discrete Trials, Mass Trials, and Naturalistic Environment Training on Autistic Individuals Using Repeated Measures.使用重复测量法研究离散试验、大量试验和自然环境训练对自闭症个体的影响。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 1;16(2):e53371. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53371. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Artificial intelligence for the measurement of vocal stereotypy.人工智能在发声刻板性测量中的应用。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Nov;114(3):368-380. doi: 10.1002/jeab.636. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the boundaries of analytic efficiency and control: A consecutive controlled case series of 26 functional analyses.评估分析效率和控制的边界:26 项功能分析的连续对照病例系列研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):25-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.544. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
2
Using Microsoft Excel® to Build a Customized Partial-Interval Data Collection System.使用Microsoft Excel®构建定制化的部分区间数据收集系统。
Behav Anal Pract. 2018 May 7;11(4):504-516. doi: 10.1007/s40617-018-0259-3. eCollection 2018 Dec 31.
3
Evaluation of the accuracy, reliability, efficiency, and acceptability of fast forwarding to score problem behavior.评价快速前进打分法评估问题行为的准确性、可靠性、效率和可接受性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Feb;52(1):315-334. doi: 10.1002/jaba.510. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
4
Predictive validity and efficiency of ongoing visual-inspection criteria for interpreting functional analyses.用于解释功能分析的现行视觉检查标准的预测效度和效率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Apr;51(2):303-320. doi: 10.1002/jaba.450. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
A Proposed Model for Selecting Measurement Procedures for the Assessment and Treatment of Problem Behavior.一种用于选择评估和治疗问题行为的测量程序的提议模型。
Behav Anal Pract. 2015 Oct 13;9(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s40617-015-0063-2. eCollection 2016 Mar.
6
Interval sampling methods and measurement error: a computer simulation.间隔抽样方法与测量误差:计算机模拟
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):83-100. doi: 10.1002/jaba.93. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
7
Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior.问题行为功能分析的三十年研究。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2013 Spring;46(1):1-21. doi: 10.1002/jaba.30.
8
Use of discontinuous methods of data collection in behavioral intervention: guidelines for practitioners.行为干预中不连续数据收集方法的使用:从业者指南
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Winter;5(2):77-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03391826.
9
Continuous recording and interobserver agreement algorithms reported in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (1995-2005).《应用行为分析杂志》(1995 - 2005年)中报道的连续记录和观察者间一致性算法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):165-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-165.
10
A method for describing preschoolers' activity preferences.一种描述学龄前儿童活动偏好的方法。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Winter;40(4):603-18. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.603-618.

应用行为分析常见实践中问题行为不连续测量的程序与准确性

Procedures and Accuracy of Discontinuous Measurement of Problem Behavior in Common Practice of Applied Behavior Analysis.

作者信息

LeBlanc Linda A, Lund Coby, Kooken Chris, Lund Janet B, Fisher Wayne W

机构信息

DataFinch Technologies, Atlanta, GA USA.

Golden, USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Jun 3;13(2):411-420. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00361-6. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1007/s40617-019-00361-6
PMID:32642397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7314895/
Abstract

Discontinuous measurement involves dividing an observation into intervals and recording whether a behavior occurred during some or all of each interval (i.e., interval recording) or at the exact time of observation (i.e., momentary time sampling; MTS). Collecting discontinuous data is often easier for observers than collecting continuous data, but it also produces more measurement error. Smaller intervals (e.g., 5 s, 10 s, 15 s) tend to produce less error but may not be used in everyday practice. This study examined the most common intervals used by a large sample of data collectors and evaluated the effect of these intervals on measurement error. The most commonly used intervals fell between 2 and 5 min. We then analyzed over 800 sessions to evaluate the correspondence between continuous and discontinuous data at each commonly used interval. Intervals of 3 min or less produced the greatest correspondence, and MTS outperformed interval recording.

摘要

间断测量包括将观察划分为若干时间段,并记录行为是否在每个时间段的部分或全部时间内发生(即时段记录),或者在观察的精确时间发生(即时点取样;MTS)。对于观察者而言,收集间断数据通常比收集连续数据更容易,但同时也会产生更多测量误差。较短的时间段(如5秒、10秒、15秒)往往产生的误差较小,但在日常实践中可能并不适用。本研究调查了大量数据收集者使用的最常见时间段,并评估了这些时间段对测量误差的影响。最常用的时间段在2至5分钟之间。然后,我们分析了800多个观察时段,以评估每个常用时间段下连续数据和间断数据之间的一致性。3分钟及以下的时间段产生的数据一致性最高,且即时点取样的效果优于时段记录。