Clancy Dawn E, Dismuke Clara E, Magruder Kathryn Marley, Simpson Kit N, Bradford David
Maybank Internal Medicine [corrected], USA.
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jan;14(1):39-44.
To evaluate whether attending diabetes group visits (GVs) leads to lower medical care charges for inadequately insured patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).
Randomized controlled clinical trial.
Data were abstracted from financial records for 186 patients with uncontrolled type 2 DM randomized to receive care in GVs or usual care for 12 months. Mann-Whitney tests for differences of means for outpatient visits (primary and specialty care), emergency department (ED) visits, and inpatient stays were performed. Separate charge models were developed for primary and specialty outpatient visits. Because GV adherence is potentially dependent on unobserved patient characteristics, treatment effect models of outpatient charges and specialty care visits were estimated using maximum likelihood methods.
Mann-Whitney test results indicated that GV patients had reduced ED and total charges but more outpatient charges than usual care patients. Ordinary least squares estimations confirmed that GVs increased outpatient visit charges; however, controlling for endogeneity by estimating a treatment effect model of outpatient visit charges showed that GVs statistically significantly reduced outpatient charges (P <.001). Estimation of a separate treatment effect model of specialty care visits confirmed that GV effects on outpatient visit charges occurred via a reduction in specialty care visits.
After controlling for endogeneity via estimation of a treatment effect model, GVs statistically significantly reduced outpatient visit charges. Estimation of a separate treatment effect model of specialty care visits indicated that GVs likely substitute for more expensive specialty care visits.
评估参加糖尿病小组门诊(GVs)是否能降低保险不足的2型糖尿病(DM)患者的医疗费用。
随机对照临床试验。
从186例2型糖尿病控制不佳患者的财务记录中提取数据,这些患者被随机分为接受GVs治疗或常规治疗12个月。对门诊就诊(初级和专科护理)、急诊科(ED)就诊和住院时间的均值差异进行曼-惠特尼检验。为初级和专科门诊就诊建立了单独的费用模型。由于GVs依从性可能取决于未观察到的患者特征,因此使用最大似然法估计门诊费用和专科护理就诊的治疗效果模型。
曼-惠特尼检验结果表明,与常规治疗患者相比,接受GVs治疗的患者急诊和总费用降低,但门诊费用更高。普通最小二乘法估计证实,GVs增加了门诊就诊费用;然而,通过估计门诊就诊费用的治疗效果模型来控制内生性表明,GVs在统计学上显著降低了门诊费用(P<.001)。对专科护理就诊的单独治疗效果模型进行估计证实,GVs对门诊就诊费用的影响是通过减少专科护理就诊实现的。
通过估计治疗效果模型控制内生性后,GVs在统计学上显著降低了门诊就诊费用。对专科护理就诊的单独治疗效果模型进行估计表明,GVs可能替代了更昂贵的专科护理就诊。