• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层医疗环境中,对患者从阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀以及从氯沙坦换用坎地沙坦的临床结局进行评估:两年随访结果

Evaluation of the clinical outcomes of switching patients from atorvastatin to simvastatin and losartan to candesartan in a primary care setting: 2 years on.

作者信息

Usher-Smith J, Ramsbottom T, Pearmain H, Kirby M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust, Suffolk, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Mar;62(3):480-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01690.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01690.x
PMID:18201178
Abstract

AIMS

This short report was designed to provide 2-year follow-up data from a previous study carried out in a primary care practice in the UK to assess the clinical and practical implications of switching to generic drugs.

METHODS

All patients previously switched from atorvastatin to simvastatin or losartan to candesartan were reviewed retrospectively 2 years after the switch. Total serum cholesterol and clinic blood pressure readings were used along with records of cardiovascular events occuring during the 2 year period to assess the clinical impact of the switch.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients switched from atorvastatin to simvastatin between March and September 2005, 65 are still registered at the practice. Of these, 61 (94%) are still on simvastatin and 58 (89%) on the same dose. There was no significant change in mean total cholesterol over this 2 year period [between 4.04 +/- 0.52 mmol/l prior to the switch and 3.90 +/- 0.63 mmol/l 2 years after the switch (p = 0.06)]. Of the 108 patients switched from losartan to candesartan, 94 are still registered at the practice and taking an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), 92 of these (98%) are still on candesartan and there was a significant reduction in blood pressure 2 years post-switch [between 138/79 +/- 12.9/6.6 prior to the switch and 131/77 +/- 13.1/7.6 mmHg 2 years after the switch (p<<0.05)]. No adverse events attributable to the switch were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

This small study provides evidence that switching drugs in primary care can be cost effective and safe in the medium term, if care is taken with selection of patients and there is structured follow-up in place.

摘要

目的

本简短报告旨在提供此前在英国一家基层医疗诊所开展的一项研究的2年随访数据,以评估改用通用药物的临床及实际影响。

方法

对所有此前从阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀或从氯沙坦换用坎地沙坦的患者,在换药2年后进行回顾性分析。采用总血清胆固醇和诊室血压读数,以及2年期间发生的心血管事件记录,来评估换药的临床影响。

结果

在2005年3月至9月期间从阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀的69例患者中,65例仍在该诊所注册。其中,61例(94%)仍在服用辛伐他汀,58例(89%)服用相同剂量。在这2年期间,平均总胆固醇无显著变化[换药前为4.04±0.52 mmol/L,换药2年后为3.90±0.63 mmol/L(p = 0.06)]。在108例从氯沙坦换用坎地沙坦的患者中,94例仍在该诊所注册并服用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),其中有92例(98%)仍在服用坎地沙坦,换药2年后血压显著降低[换药前为138/79±12.9/6.6,换药2年后为131/77±13.1/7.6 mmHg(p<<0.05)]。两组均未报告因换药导致的不良事件。

结论

这项小型研究表明,在基层医疗中换药如果谨慎选择患者并进行结构化随访,在中期可能具有成本效益且安全。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the clinical outcomes of switching patients from atorvastatin to simvastatin and losartan to candesartan in a primary care setting: 2 years on.在基层医疗环境中,对患者从阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀以及从氯沙坦换用坎地沙坦的临床结局进行评估:两年随访结果
Int J Clin Pract. 2008 Mar;62(3):480-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01690.x. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
2
Evaluation of the cost savings and clinical outcomes of switching patients from atorvastatin to simvastatin and losartan to candesartan in a Primary Care setting.在基层医疗环境中,评估将患者从阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀以及从氯沙坦换用坎地沙坦的成本节约和临床结果。
Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Jan;61(1):15-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01217.x.
3
A comparative economic analysis of simvastatin versus atorvastatin: results of the Surrogate Marker Cost-Efficacy (SMaC) study.
Clin Ther. 1999 Oct;21(10):1788-96. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(99)80056-3.
4
Cardiovascular event rates in atorvastatin patients versus patients switching from atorvastatin to simvastatin.阿托伐他汀治疗患者与阿托伐他汀换用辛伐他汀治疗患者的心血管事件发生率。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jul;29(7):773-81. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.802229. Epub 2013 May 23.
5
Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction after switching patients on other statins to rosuvastatin or simvastatin in a real-world clinical practice setting.在真实临床实践环境中,将服用其他他汀类药物的患者换用瑞舒伐他汀或辛伐他汀后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低情况的比较。
Am J Manag Care. 2007 Dec;13 Suppl 10:S270-5.
6
[Angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors in hemodialysed uremia patients with arterial hypertension: candesartan cilexitil versus losartan].[血管紧张素 II 受体抑制剂用于血液透析的高血压尿毒症患者:坎地沙坦酯与氯沙坦的比较]
Cardiologia. 1999 Dec;44(12):1071-6.
7
Coadministration of valsartan 160 and 320 mg and simvastatin 20 and 40 mg in patients with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia: a multicenter, 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group superiority study.缬沙坦160毫克和320毫克与辛伐他汀20毫克和40毫克联合用于高血压和高胆固醇血症患者:一项多中心、为期12周的双盲、双模拟、平行组优效性研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Oct;30(10):1782-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.10.004.
8
Clinical consequences following regulatory changes in respect to reimbursement of statins cost by the Icelandic Social Insurance Administration.冰岛社会保险管理局调整他汀类药物报销政策后的临床后果。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Nov;40(7):663-7. doi: 10.1177/1403494812458991. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
9
A placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg, and losartan, 50 mg, as monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, using 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.使用36小时动态血压监测,对8毫克坎地沙坦酯和50毫克氯沙坦作为原发性高血压患者单一疗法的疗效和耐受性进行安慰剂对照比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Apr;60(4):391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00903.x.
10
Switch from ABCD pretreatment to A-II-A treatment: a multinational, open, centrally randomized, prospective parallel group comparison.从ABCD预处理转换为A-II-A治疗:一项跨国、开放、中心随机、前瞻性平行组比较研究。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 2004;30(4):153-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Patterns of statin utilisation for new users and market dynamics in South Korea: a 13-year retrospective cohort study.韩国新用户中他汀类药物的使用模式和市场动态:一项 13 年回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e026603. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026603.
2
Evaluation of statin utilization in the Republic of Macedonia during 2013-2016.2013 - 2016年期间马其顿共和国他汀类药物使用情况评估。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 26;10:339-347. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S157842. eCollection 2018.
3
Effect of therapeutic interchange on medication reconciliation during hospitalization and upon discharge in a geriatric population.
治疗性药物互换对老年人群住院期间及出院时用药核对的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0186075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186075. eCollection 2017.
4
Use of Generics-A Critical Cost Containment Measure for All Healthcare Professionals in Europe?通用药物的使用——欧洲所有医疗专业人员控制成本的关键措施?
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2010 Aug 5;3(8):2470-2494. doi: 10.3390/ph3082470.
5
Do newly marketed generic medicines expand markets using descriptive time series analysis and mixed logit models? Korea as an exemplar and its implications.新上市的仿制药是否通过描述性时间序列分析和混合逻辑模型来拓展市场?以韩国为例及其启示。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1356-z.
6
The impact of the 'Better Care Better Value' prescribing policy on the utilisation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for treating hypertension in the UK primary care setting: longitudinal quasi-experimental design.“优质医疗,合理价值”处方政策对英国基层医疗中使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗高血压的影响:纵向准实验设计
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1013-y.
7
Prescribing efficiency of proton pump inhibitors in China: influence and future directions.中国质子泵抑制剂的处方效率:影响因素与未来方向
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:11. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0638-6.
8
Different initiatives across Europe to enhance losartan utilization post generics: impact and implications.欧洲各地提高氯沙坦仿制药使用的不同举措:影响和意义。
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Oct 8;5:219. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00219. eCollection 2014.
9
Multiple policies to enhance prescribing efficiency for established medicines in Europe with a particular focus on demand-side measures: findings and future implications.多政策提高欧洲已上市药品的处方效率,特别关注需求方措施:发现与未来影响。
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Jun 17;5:106. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00106. eCollection 2014.
10
Can authorities appreciably enhance the prescribing of oral generic risperidone to conserve resources? Findings from across Europe and their implications.当局能否显著增加口服通用型利培酮的处方量以节约资源?来自欧洲各地的研究结果及其影响。
BMC Med. 2014 Jun 13;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-98.