Harvey Adrienne, Robin Jonathan, Morris Meg E, Graham H Kerr, Baker Richard
University of Melbourne, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Mar;50(3):190-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02027.x. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
This systematic review critically appraises the literature on the psychometric properties and clinical utility of evaluative activity limitation outcome measures used for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The search strategy yielded 29 articles for eight outcome measures that met the inclusion criteria for the review. The Gross Motor Function Measure and Activities Scale for Kids were found to have sound psychometric properties in most areas. Reliability was found to be adequate for all tools. For the CP population, further examination of some aspects of validity is required for the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ), Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI), and the Functional Independence Measure for Children. The FAQ, CHQ, FMS, and PODCI were found to require further examination for responsiveness. Clinical utility of the measures varied. The FMS was the only one to differentiate between function in the home, school, and community and to consider different assistive devices. These findings suggest that a range of measures is required to evaluate activity, and assessment should be tailored to the individual needs of children with CP.
本系统评价对有关用于脑瘫(CP)儿童的评估性活动受限结局指标的心理测量特性和临床效用的文献进行了批判性评估。检索策略产生了29篇关于八项结局指标的文章,这些指标符合本评价的纳入标准。发现粗大运动功能测量量表和儿童活动量表在大多数方面具有良好的心理测量特性。所有工具的信度都足够。对于CP人群,儿童健康问卷(CHQ)、功能评估问卷(FAQ)、功能移动性量表(FMS)、儿童残疾评估量表、儿科结局数据收集工具(PODCI)和儿童功能独立性测量量表在效度的某些方面需要进一步检验。发现FAQ、CHQ、FMS和PODCI在反应度方面需要进一步检验。这些指标的临床效用各不相同。FMS是唯一能区分家庭、学校和社区功能并考虑不同辅助设备的指标。这些发现表明,需要一系列指标来评估活动,并且评估应根据CP儿童的个体需求进行调整。