Radhakrishnan Hema, Charman W Neil
Faculty of Life Sciences, Moffat Building, University of Manchester, P.O. Box 88, Sackville Street, Manchester M60 1QD, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jan;28(1):73-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00521.x.
It has been suggested that, following eye movements, the changing pressures exerted by the extraocular muscles and the lids might distort the shape of the eyeball and alter refraction across the visual field. To confirm or refute this hypothesis, the pattern of monocular peripheral refraction in the right eyes of 10 healthy young adults was measured either by turning the eye to fixate a series of horizontally spaced targets or by turning the head to view the same targets while maintaining central fixation and the eye in its primary position. In each case a fixed Shin-Nippon autorefractor was used to measure peripheral refraction at 5 degrees intervals over the central +/-30 degrees of the visual field. The duration of any eye turn was < or =1 min. Repeated-measures analysis showed no significant differences between the spherical equivalents of peripheral refraction measured under the two conditions (p = 0.223). A further study of five subjects involving 2.5-min periods of fixation with an eye or head turn of 25 degrees also showed no significant refractive differences. Thus, within the conditions of the study (eye-turn durations and field angles < or =2.5 min and 30 degrees respectively), the results fail to confirm the occurrence of large differences in peripheral refraction when measurements are made with eye turn rather than head turn.
有人提出,眼球运动后,眼外肌和眼睑施加的不断变化的压力可能会扭曲眼球形状,并改变整个视野的屈光状态。为了证实或反驳这一假设,对10名健康年轻成年人右眼的单眼周边屈光模式进行了测量,测量方法要么是转动眼球注视一系列水平间隔排列的目标,要么是在保持中央注视且眼球处于初始位置的同时转动头部来观察相同的目标。在每种情况下,都使用一台固定的 Shin-Nippon 自动验光仪,在视野中央±30度范围内每隔5度测量一次周边屈光。任何一次眼球转动的持续时间均≤1分钟。重复测量分析表明,在两种条件下测量的周边屈光球镜当量之间没有显著差异(p = 0.2)。对5名受试者进行的另一项研究,让他们分别进行2.5分钟的眼球或头部固定转动,转动角度为25度,结果也显示屈光没有显著差异。因此,在本研究的条件下(眼球转动持续时间和视野角度分别≤2.5分钟和30度),当通过眼球转动而非头部转动进行测量时,结果未能证实周边屈光存在巨大差异。