• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因需切除而转诊的困难结肠息肉的处理:切除还是再次内镜检查?

Management of the difficult colon polyp referred for resection: resect or rescope?

作者信息

Voloyiannis Theodoros, Snyder Michael J, Bailey Randolph R, Pidala Mark

机构信息

University of Texas Houston, Health Science Center, Colon and Rectal Surgery, Houston, Texas 77090, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):292-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9175-2. Epub 2008 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10350-007-9175-2
PMID:18202891
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients are frequently referred for resection of difficult colon polyps. Before colectomy the experienced surgeon has the option of repeating the colonoscopy to assess the polyp, tattoo the site, and potentially remove the polyp. The purpose of this study was to review our results with this approach.

METHODS

All new patients referred during a five-year period to an 11-physician colon and rectal surgical group with the diagnosis of colon polyp (CPT 211.3) that was not previously removed were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with rectal polyps, inflammatory bowel disease, previous cancer, or familial adenomatous polyposis were excluded. Patient demographics, details of the polyps, success of polypectomy, reasons for surgical resection, pathology, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 252 patients with a mean age of 65 years. Eighty patients underwent resection upon referral without a repeat colonoscopy. Upon resection, invasive cancers were found in 13 cases. A total of 172 patients underwent at least one repeat colonoscopy by the colorectal surgeon. Of this group, 101 patients had successful polypectomy, thus avoiding major colectomy. The remaining 71 patients had a subsequent colon resection after at least one repeat colonoscopy. In 26 cases the polyp site was tattooed for later localization. There were nine postpolypectomy hemorrhages treated nonoperatively and two perforations.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat colonoscopy by an experienced surgeon leads to complete removal and avoidance of major colectomy in 58 percent of these cases. Patients with large difficult polyps referred for resection should be considered for repeat colonoscopy before surgery.

摘要

目的

患者常因难以切除的结肠息肉而前来就诊。在进行结肠切除术之前,经验丰富的外科医生可以选择再次进行结肠镜检查,以评估息肉情况、标记息肉部位,并有可能切除息肉。本研究的目的是回顾我们采用这种方法的结果。

方法

回顾性分析在五年期间转诊至一个由11名医生组成的结肠直肠外科团队、诊断为结肠息肉(CPT 211.3)且此前未切除的所有新患者。排除患有直肠息肉、炎症性肠病、既往癌症或家族性腺瘤性息肉病的患者。分析患者的人口统计学资料、息肉细节、息肉切除术的成功率、手术切除的原因、病理情况及并发症。

结果

研究人群包括252例患者,平均年龄65岁。80例患者在转诊时未进行再次结肠镜检查即接受了切除手术。切除术中发现13例浸润性癌。共有172例患者接受了结直肠外科医生至少一次的再次结肠镜检查。在这组患者中,101例患者息肉切除成功,从而避免了大的结肠切除术。其余71例患者在至少一次再次结肠镜检查后接受了结肠切除术。26例患者对息肉部位进行了标记以便后续定位。有9例息肉切除术后出血经非手术治疗,2例发生穿孔。

结论

经验丰富的外科医生进行再次结肠镜检查可使58%的此类病例实现息肉完全切除并避免大的结肠切除术。对于因难以切除的大息肉而转诊进行切除手术的患者,术前应考虑再次进行结肠镜检查。

相似文献

1
Management of the difficult colon polyp referred for resection: resect or rescope?因需切除而转诊的困难结肠息肉的处理:切除还是再次内镜检查?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Mar;51(3):292-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9175-2. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
2
Preoperative colonoscopy decreases the need for laparoscopic management of colonic polyps.术前结肠镜检查可减少结肠息肉腹腔镜治疗的需求。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):1076-80. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0908-1.
3
Cap polyposis: further experience and review.息肉病:更多经验及综述。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1208-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0561-8. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
4
Malignant colon polyps--cure by colonoscopy or colectomy?恶性结肠息肉——通过结肠镜检查还是结肠切除术治愈?
Am J Gastroenterol. 1984 Jul;79(7):543-7.
5
Colonoscopic resection of large colonic polyps--a prospective study.大肠大息肉的结肠镜切除术——一项前瞻性研究。
Isr J Med Sci. 1997 Dec;33(12):777-80.
6
High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up.在临床试验之外,息肉切除术后随访结肠镜检查也可实现高依从率:随访低依从性不会降低息肉切除术的疗效。
Colorectal Dis. 2004 May;6(3):158-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00585.x.
7
Physician assessment and management of complex colon polyps: a multicenter video-based survey study.医生对复杂结肠息肉的评估和管理:一项基于多中心视频的调查研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1312-24. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.95. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Laparoscopic colon resection for polyps: a good novice case?腹腔镜下息肉切除术治疗结肠息肉:是适合新手的好病例吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Jun;49(6):879-82. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0530-5.
9
Large refractory colonic polyps: is it time to change our practice? A prospective study of the clinical and economic impact of a tertiary referral colonic mucosal resection and polypectomy service (with videos).巨大不可切除结肠息肉:是否该改变我们的治疗策略了?一项关于三级转诊结肠黏膜切除术和息肉切除术服务的临床和经济影响的前瞻性研究(附有视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Dec;70(6):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.039. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
10
Clinical characteristics of colorectal polyp in Thai children: a retrospective study.泰国儿童大肠息肉的临床特征:一项回顾性研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Jan;87(1):41-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Overtreatment in colorectal cancer prevention: comparison between surgical and endoscopic treatment of benign colonic polyps.结直肠癌预防中的过度治疗:良性结肠息肉手术治疗与内镜治疗的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 5;18:17562848251351214. doi: 10.1177/17562848251351214. eCollection 2025.
2
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Early Colorectal Cancer.早期结直肠癌的诊断与治疗管理
Visc Med. 2023 Mar;39(1):10-16. doi: 10.1159/000526633. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3
Endoscopic techniques to reduce recurrence rates after colorectal EMR: systematic review and meta-analysis.
内镜技术降低结直肠 EMR 后复发率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5422-5429. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08574-z. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
4
Overutilization of surgical resection for benign colorectal polyps: analysis from a tertiary care center.良性结直肠息肉手术切除的过度使用:来自三级医疗中心的分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 May;9(5):E706-E712. doi: 10.1055/a-1380-3017. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
5
Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques.使用结肠保留技术评估一种用于治疗不可切除结肠息肉的渐进式算法方法。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6633-6642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer.良性息肉和结直肠癌的结肠切除术率的变化。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):802-808. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07451-5. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
7
Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps: A 10-Year Nationwide Analysis.非恶性结直肠息肉手术后的发病率和死亡率:一项 10 年的全国性分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov;114(11):1802-1810. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000407.
8
Polypectomy versus surgery in early colon cancer: size and location of colon cancer affect long-term survival.早期结肠癌的息肉切除术与手术治疗:结肠癌的大小和位置影响长期生存率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1349-1357. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3101-z. Epub 2018 Jun 24.
9
Antigravity ESD - double-balloon-assisted underwater with traction hybrid technique.抗重力内镜黏膜下剥离术——双气囊辅助水下牵引混合技术
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jun;6(6):E739-E744. doi: 10.1055/a-0578-8081. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
Management of complex polyps of the colon and rectum.结肠和直肠复杂息肉的管理
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;33(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2950-1. Epub 2017 Dec 28.