Zhao Beiqun, Roper Michelle T, Klaristenfeld Daniel D, Tomassi Marco J
Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Drive, MC 7220, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA.
Department of General Surgery, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6633-6642. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
The majority of endoscopically unresectable colon polyps (EUCP) are treated by segmental colectomy. However, up to 90% of EUCP do not harbor malignancy, making colectomy an unnecessary procedure. To minimize unnecessary segmental colectomy, we established a progressive treatment algorithm utilizing colon conservation techniques (CCT). In our progressive CCT algorithm, patients with EUCP first underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If unsuccessful, they progressed to combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and ultimately to segmental colectomy, if necessary.
We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated by our progressive CCT algorithm from August 2015 to April 2019. Demographic information, polyp characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared the outcomes of our CCT algorithm group to 156 patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP at related institutions from August 2015 to August 2018.
A total of 102 EUCP in 97 patients were treated with our progressive CCT algorithm. Of these, 76 of 102 (75.5%) EUCP were removed without requiring segmental colectomy, with 42 EUCP removed via ESD and 34 via CELS. Interval surveillance colonoscopy confirmed that 72 of 97 (74.2%) patients with EUCP treated by CCT completely avoided segmental colectomy. Polyps > 5 cm in size was a significant predictor of CCT failure (OR 3.83, P = 0.03). When compared to an external cohort of patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP, the CCT algorithm was associated with longer operative time, but shorter length of stay, with no difference in postoperative complications. The estimated total healthcare cost of the CCT algorithm was lower than segmental colectomy ($10,956.77 versus $16,692.94), with more dramatic cost savings seen in ESD ($4,492.70) and CELS ($8,507.06).
An established progressive CCT algorithm can result in high colon conservation rate and decrease associated health care costs compared to segmental colectomy. It is a reasonable treatment strategy for patients with EUCP.
大多数内镜下无法切除的结肠息肉(EUCP)通过节段性结肠切除术进行治疗。然而,高达90%的EUCP并无恶性病变,使得结肠切除术成为不必要的手术。为尽量减少不必要的节段性结肠切除术,我们建立了一种采用结肠保留技术(CCT)的递进式治疗方案。在我们的递进式CCT方案中,EUCP患者首先接受内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)。若不成功,则进展为内镜-腹腔镜联合手术(CELS),必要时最终进行节段性结肠切除术。
我们对2015年8月至2019年4月期间采用我们的递进式CCT方案治疗的所有患者进行了回顾性分析。分析了人口统计学信息、息肉特征和临床结局。我们还将CCT方案组的结局与2015年8月至2018年8月期间在相关机构因EUCP接受节段性结肠切除术的156例患者的结局进行了比较。
共有97例患者的102个EUCP采用我们的递进式CCT方案进行了治疗。其中,102个EUCP中有76个(75.5%)在无需节段性结肠切除术的情况下被切除,42个EUCP通过ESD切除,34个通过CELS切除。间隔期结肠镜检查证实,97例接受CCT治疗的EUCP患者中有72例(74.2%)完全避免了节段性结肠切除术。息肉大小>5 cm是CCT失败的显著预测因素(OR 3.83,P = 0.03)。与因EUCP接受节段性结肠切除术的外部队列患者相比,CCT方案的手术时间更长,但住院时间更短,术后并发症无差异。CCT方案的估计总医疗费用低于节段性结肠切除术(10,956.77美元对16,692.94美元),ESD(4,492.70美元)和CELS(8,507.06美元)的费用节省更为显著。
与节段性结肠切除术相比,既定的递进式CCT方案可实现较高的结肠保留率并降低相关医疗费用。对于EUCP患者而言,这是一种合理的治疗策略。