Suppr超能文献

非官方支付的国家间比较:波罗的海国家卫生部门社会审计结果

An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States.

作者信息

Cockcroft Anne, Andersson Neil, Paredes-Solís Sergio, Caldwell Dawn, Mitchell Steve, Milne Deborah, Merhi Serge, Roche Melissa, Konceviciute Elena, Ledogar Robert J

机构信息

CIETeurope, PO Box 8636, London SW6 2ZB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jan 21;8:15. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.

METHODS

Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results.

RESULTS

Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services.

CONCLUSION

This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.

摘要

背景

关于卫生部门非官方支付的跨国比较很少见。2002年,我们对波罗的海三国的卫生部门进行了一次社会审计。

方法

从每个国家30个群组的分层、最后阶段随机样本中进行了约10320次家庭访谈,并结合机构审查得出了初步结果。服务使用者、护士和医生的单独焦点小组对这些结果进行了解读。每个国家的利益相关者研讨会讨论了调查结果和焦点小组结果。

结果

近一半的受访者不认为向卫生工作者支付非官方费用是腐败行为,但有一半(爱沙尼亚43%、拉脱维亚45%、立陶宛64%)认为政府卫生服务中的腐败程度很高。很少有人(爱沙尼亚1%、拉脱维亚3%、立陶宛8%)承认在最近一次接受服务时支付了非官方费用。三国约14%的家庭成员在最近一次与政府服务接触时赠送了礼物。

结论

这次社会审计能够对波罗的海三国卫生服务中非官方支付的认知、态度和经历进行比较。爱沙尼亚的腐败现象最少。拉脱维亚处于中间水平。立陶宛的非官方支付现象最多,对该系统的不信任程度也最高。这些调查结果可作为干预措施的基线,并用于比较每个国家在非官方支付方面的卫生服务改革方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0480/2233619/55f304c54af4/1472-6963-8-15-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验