• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我”还是“我们”?个性与公正作为组织内创新公民行为以他人为中心的前因的作用。

Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations.

作者信息

Moon Henry, Kamdar Dishan, Mayer David M, Takeuchi Riki

机构信息

Organizational Behavior Department, London Business School, London, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):84-94. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84.

DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84
PMID:18211137
Abstract

The present research takes an "other-centered" approach to examining personal and contextual antecedents of taking charge behavior in organizations. Largely consistent with the authors' hypotheses, regression analyses involving data collected from 2 diverse samples containing both coworkers and supervisors demonstrated that the other-centered trait, duty, was positively related to taking charge, whereas the self-centered trait, achievement striving, was negatively related to taking charge. In addition, the authors found that procedural justice at the organizational level was positively related to taking charge when evaluated by a coworker, while both procedural and distributive justice were positively related to taking charge when considered by a supervisor. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

摘要

本研究采用“以他人为中心”的方法来考察组织中主动负责行为的个人和情境 antecedents。在很大程度上与作者的假设一致,涉及从包含同事和上级的两个不同样本收集的数据的回归分析表明,以他人为中心的特质——责任感,与主动负责呈正相关,而以自我为中心的特质——成就追求,与主动负责呈负相关。此外,作者发现,当由同事进行评估时,组织层面的程序正义与主动负责呈正相关,而当由上级考虑时,程序正义和分配正义都与主动负责呈正相关。文中讨论了理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Me or we? The role of personality and justice as other-centered antecedents to innovative citizenship behaviors within organizations.“我”还是“我们”?个性与公正作为组织内创新公民行为以他人为中心的前因的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):84-94. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.84.
2
The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.主动人格在工作满意度和组织公民行为中的作用:关系视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):395-404. doi: 10.1037/a0018079.
3
Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation.仆人式领导、程序公正氛围、服务氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为:跨层次调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):517-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018867.
4
Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model.辱虐管理的前因与后果:涓滴效应模型的检验
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):191-201. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191.
5
Disentangling role perceptions: how perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge.厘清角色认知:感知到的角色广度、自主权、工具性和效能如何与帮助和负责相关联。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Sep;92(5):1200-11. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200.
6
Loving yourself abundantly: relationship of the narcissistic personality to self- and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance.充分爱自己:自恋型人格与工作场所偏差行为、领导力以及任务和情境绩效的自我认知与他人认知之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Jul;91(4):762-76. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762.
7
Understanding the independent influence of duty and achievement striving when predicting the relationship between conscientiousness and organizational cultural profiles and helping behaviors.理解尽责性与组织文化特征和帮助行为之间的关系中,任务和成就追求的独立影响。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):225-32. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.740539. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
8
The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework.公平氛围和公平取向对工作成果的影响:一个跨层次多焦点框架。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):242-56. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242.
9
Distributive justice, procedural justice, and psychological distress: the moderating effect of coworker support and work autonomy.分配正义、程序正义与心理困扰:同事支持与工作自主性的调节作用
J Occup Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;14(3):305-17. doi: 10.1037/a0015747.
10
Got political skill? The impact of justice on the importance of political skill for job performance.有政治技巧吗?正义对政治技巧对工作绩效重要性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Nov;94(6):1427-37. doi: 10.1037/a0017154.

引用本文的文献

1
How exploitative leadership undermines subordinates' taking charge behavior? A moderated mediation model.剥削型领导如何破坏下属的主动负责行为?一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2025 May 6;13(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02791-0.
2
Unwilling or Unable? The Impact of Role Clarity and Job Competence on Frontline Employees' Taking Charge Behaviors in Hospitality Industry.不情愿还是无能力?角色清晰度和工作能力对酒店业一线员工主动负责行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;15(4):526. doi: 10.3390/bs15040526.
3
How Ambivalence Toward Digital-AI Transformation Affects Taking-Charge Behavior: A Threat-Rigidity Theoretical Perspective.
对数字人工智能转型的矛盾心理如何影响主动行为:威胁僵化理论视角
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;15(3):261. doi: 10.3390/bs15030261.
4
The Impact of Empowering Leadership on Taking Charge Behaviors: Mediating Strengths Use and Moderating Ambition.赋能型领导对主动负责行为的影响:优势利用的中介作用与抱负的调节作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 24;14(8):633. doi: 10.3390/bs14080633.
5
Effects of Inclusive Leadership on the Diversity Climate and Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior.包容性领导对多元化氛围和变革导向型组织公民行为的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 11;14(6):491. doi: 10.3390/bs14060491.
6
Compete or Cooperate? Goal Orientations and Coworker Popularity in the Knowledge-Sharing Dilemma.竞争还是合作?知识共享困境中的目标导向与同事受欢迎程度
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 19;14(3):250. doi: 10.3390/bs14030250.
7
The double-edged sword of personality in shaping craftsmanship spirit: an investigation of conscientiousness and openness to experience.人格在塑造工匠精神中的双刃剑:尽责性与经验开放性的调查
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;15:1332257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332257. eCollection 2024.
8
Does employee engagement promote innovation? The Facilitators of innovative workplace behavior via mediation and moderation.员工敬业度能促进创新吗?通过中介作用和调节作用对创新型工作场所行为的促进因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 8;9(11):e21817. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21817. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
How does authentic leadership promote taking charge: The mediating effect of team social capital and the moderating effect of absorptive capacity.真实型领导如何促进主动担当:团队社会资本的中介作用与吸收能力的调节作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 5;13:1046914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1046914. eCollection 2022.
10
When and why proactive employees get promoted: A trait activation perspective.积极主动的员工何时以及为何会获得晋升:特质激活视角。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Dec 28:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-04142-3.