Svantesson Ulla, Zander Martina, Klingberg Sofia, Slinde Frode
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Negat Results Biomed. 2008 Jan 22;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-7-1.
The aim of this study was to compare body composition results from bioelectrical spectroscopy (BIS) with results from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a population of male elite athletes. Body composition was assessed using DXA (Lunar Prodigy, GE Lunar Corp., Madison, USA) and BIS (Hydra 4200, Xitron Technologies Inc, San Diego, California, USA) at the same occasion. Agreement between methods was assessed using paired t-tests and agreement-plots.
Thirty-three male elite athletes (soccer and ice hockey) were included in the study. The results showed that BIS underestimates the proportion of fat mass by 4.6% points in the ice hockey players. In soccer players the BIS resulted in a lower mean fat mass by 1.1% points. Agreement between the methods at the individual level was highly variable.
Body composition results assessed by BIS in elite athletes should be interpreted with caution, especially in individual subjects. BIS may present values of fat mass that is either higher or lower than fat mass assessed by DXA, independent of true fat content of the individual.
本研究的目的是比较生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)与双能X线吸收法(DXA)在男性精英运动员群体中的身体成分分析结果。在同一时间使用DXA(美国威斯康星州通用电气公司的Lunar Prodigy)和BIS(美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥市Xitron Technologies公司的Hydra 4200)评估身体成分。使用配对t检验和一致性图评估两种方法之间的一致性。
33名男性精英运动员(足球和冰球运动员)纳入本研究。结果显示,BIS低估了冰球运动员体脂质量比例4.6个百分点。在足球运动员中,BIS得出的平均体脂质量低1.1个百分点。个体水平上两种方法之间的一致性差异很大。
在精英运动员中,通过BIS评估的身体成分结果应谨慎解读,尤其是在个体受试者中。BIS可能呈现出高于或低于DXA评估的体脂质量值,与个体的真实脂肪含量无关。