Feldblum Paul J, Adeiga Adesina, Bakare Rashidi, Wevill Silver, Lendvay Anja, Obadaki Fatimah, Olayemi M Onikepe, Wang Lily, Nanda Kavita, Rountree Wes
Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
PLoS One. 2008 Jan 23;3(1):e1474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001474.
The objective of this trial was to determine the effectiveness of 1.0% C31G (SAVVY) in preventing male-to-female vaginal transmission of HIV infection among women at high risk.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This was a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Participants made up to 12 monthly follow-up visits for HIV testing, adverse event reporting, and study product supply. The study was conducted between September 2004 and December 2006 in Lagos and Ibadan, Nigeria, where we enrolled 2153 HIV-negative women at high risk of HIV infection. Participants were randomized 1 ratio 1 to SAVVY or placebo. The effectiveness endpoint was incidence of HIV infection as indicated by detection of HIV antibodies in oral mucosal transudate (rapid test) or blood (ELISA), and confirmed by Western blot or PCR testing. We observed 33 seroconversions (21 in the SAVVY group, 12 in the placebo group). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative probability of HIV infection at 12 months were 0.028 in the SAVVY group and 0.015 in the placebo group (2-sided p-value for the log-rank test of treatment effect 0.121). The point estimate of the hazard ratio was 1.7 for SAVVY versus placebo (95% confidence interval 0.9, 3.5). Because of lower-than-expected HIV incidence, we did not observe the required number of HIV infections (66) for adequate power to detect an effect of SAVVY. Follow-up frequencies of adverse events, reproductive tract adverse events, abnormal pelvic examination findings, chlamydial infections and vaginal infections were similar in the study arms. No serious adverse event was attributable to SAVVY use.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: SAVVY did not reduce the incidence of HIV infection. Although the hazard ratio was higher in the SAVVY than the placebo group, we cannot conclude that there was a harmful treatment effect of SAVVY.
本试验的目的是确定1.0% C31G(SAVVY)在预防高危女性中男性向女性阴道传播HIV感染方面的有效性。
方法/主要发现:这是一项3期双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。参与者进行了多达12次每月的随访,以进行HIV检测、不良事件报告和研究产品供应。该研究于2004年9月至2006年12月在尼日利亚的拉各斯和伊巴丹进行,我们招募了2153名有HIV感染高危风险的HIV阴性女性。参与者按1:1随机分配至SAVVY组或安慰剂组。有效性终点是通过口腔黏膜渗出液(快速检测)或血液(酶联免疫吸附测定)中HIV抗体检测所表明的HIV感染发生率,并通过蛋白质印迹法或聚合酶链反应检测进行确认。我们观察到33例血清转化(SAVVY组21例,安慰剂组12例)。SAVVY组12个月时HIV感染累积概率的Kaplan-Meier估计值为0.028,安慰剂组为0.015(治疗效果对数秩检验的双侧p值为0.121)。SAVVY组与安慰剂组的风险比点估计值为1.7(95%置信区间0.9,3.5)。由于HIV发病率低于预期,我们未观察到检测SAVVY效果所需的足够效力的HIV感染数量(66例)。研究组中不良事件、生殖道不良事件、盆腔检查异常结果、衣原体感染和阴道感染的随访频率相似。未发现严重不良事件可归因于使用SAVVY。
结论/意义:SAVVY未降低HIV感染发生率。尽管SAVVY组的风险比高于安慰剂组,但我们不能得出SAVVY存在有害治疗效果的结论。