Suppr超能文献

工业工作场所中的复杂混合物:室内空气质量评估的经验教训。

Complex mixtures in industrial workspaces: lessons for indoor air quality evaluations.

作者信息

Lippy B E, Turner R W

机构信息

Aerosol Monitoring & Analysis, Inc., Hanover, MD 21076.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1991 Nov;95:81-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.919581.

Abstract

Acceptable occupational exposure levels for hundreds of airborne concentrations of dusts, vapors, fumes, and gases have been set by consensus organizations and regulatory bodies for decades. These levels have established tremendous precedent and are tempting reference values in the relatively new field of indoor air quality evaluations where validated criteria are greatly needed. The American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has been the most visible and productive group setting these guidelines for industrial exposure. The ACGIH Chemical Substances Committee has published an annual list of threshold limit values (TLVs) for more than 40 years. Currently the list covers more than 400 substances. In 1989, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published updated permissible exposure limits (PELs) for approximately 600 substances. Most PELs before this update were adopted from the 1968 ACGIH list of TLVs and consensus standards of the American Standards Association. This OSHA update has resulted in reductions of 212 PELs and the addition of 164 new levels. The magnitude of the problem of protecting workers can be seen by the small fraction that the OSHA PELs represent of the more than 60,000 entries in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances. None of these levels, whether guidelines or regulatory requirements, are established based on any possible synergistic effect with other chemicals. The only guidance given by the ACGIH for synergistic effects is that such cases must be determined individually. Clearly, there are major drawbacks in using occupational standards and guidelines for evaluating the health effects of chemical agents that can be found in office settings, often in concentrations orders of magnitude less than what is routinely measured in the workplace. These guidelines are even less valuable when the concern is the complex mixing of chemicals in nonoccupational environments.

摘要

几十年来,共识组织和监管机构已经为数百种空气中的粉尘、蒸汽、烟雾和气体浓度设定了可接受的职业接触限值。这些限值已经确立了巨大的先例,在急需有效标准的室内空气质量评估这一相对较新的领域中,它们是颇具吸引力的参考值。美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)一直是设定这些工业接触指南的最知名且最具成效的组织。ACGIH化学物质委员会已经连续40多年发布年度阈限值(TLV)清单。目前该清单涵盖了400多种物质。1989年,职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)发布了约600种物质的更新后的允许接触限值(PEL)。此次更新之前的大多数PEL是从1968年ACGIH的TLV清单以及美国标准协会的共识标准中采用的。OSHA的此次更新导致212项PEL降低,并新增了164个限值水平。与美国国家职业安全与健康研究所化学物质毒性效应登记处登记的60000多条记录相比,OSHA的PEL仅占一小部分,由此可见保护工人问题的严重性。这些限值,无论是指南还是监管要求,均未基于与其他化学物质的任何可能协同效应来制定。ACGIH针对协同效应给出的唯一指导意见是,此类情况必须单独判定。显然,在使用职业标准和指南来评估办公环境中可能存在的化学制剂的健康影响时存在重大缺陷,办公环境中的化学制剂浓度通常比工作场所常规测量的浓度低几个数量级。当关注的是非职业环境中化学物质的复杂混合时,这些指南的价值就更低了。

相似文献

7
Biological monitoring and standard setting in the USA: a critical appraisal.
Toxicol Lett. 1995 May;77(1-3):171-82. doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03288-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验