Grönroos Marika H, Jahnukainen Timo, Irjala Kerttu, Härkönen Risto, Hurme Saija, Möttönen Merja, Salmi Toivo T
Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 May;23(5):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0722-9. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Evaluation of renal function should be performed as part of the follow-up during and after chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to compare an isotope clearance method [isotope glomerular filtration rate (iGFR)] with alternative methods to determine GFR in such patients. Isotope GFR [(99m)Tc-labeled diethylene triaminopentoacetic acid (DTPA) or (51)Cr-labeled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (EDTA)] was measured in 36 children (112 studies) and compared with simultaneously measured creatinine clearance (CrCl), serum creatinine (SCr), and cystatin C (CysC) concentrations, as well as the results of Schwartz, Counahan-Barratt, and Cockroft-Gault formulae, using general linear mixed models. Our results showed a significant association between iGFR and CysC concentrations (p < 0.001). No linear relationship was observed between CrCl and iGFR (p = 0.7). As expected, the results of height-based formulae (Counahan-Barratt and Schwartz) had significantly (p = 0.004) better correlation to iGFR than the results of a formula based on weight (Cockroft-Gault) (p = 0.19). Despite significant linear correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients showed poor agreement. Tests of similarity between iGFR estimates showed differences between average values of GFR. Therefore, determination of iGFR remains the method of choice in estimation of GFR in cancer patients. In our study population, assay of serum CysC was the most reliable alternative method to measure glomerular function.
在小儿癌症患者化疗期间及化疗后随访过程中,应进行肾功能评估。本研究的目的是比较同位素清除法[同位素肾小球滤过率(iGFR)]与其他测定此类患者肾小球滤过率(GFR)的方法。对36名儿童(共112项研究)测定了同位素GFR[(99m)Tc标记的二乙三胺五乙酸(DTPA)或(51)Cr标记的乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)],并使用广义线性混合模型将其与同时测定的肌酐清除率(CrCl)、血清肌酐(SCr)和胱抑素C(CysC)浓度以及Schwartz公式、Counahan - Barratt公式和Cockcroft - Gault公式的结果进行比较。我们的结果显示iGFR与CysC浓度之间存在显著相关性(p < 0.001)。未观察到CrCl与iGFR之间存在线性关系(p = 0.7)。正如预期的那样,基于身高的公式(Counahan - Barratt和Schwartz)的结果与iGFR的相关性显著优于基于体重的公式(Cockcroft - Gault)(p = 0.004)(p = 0.19)。尽管存在显著的线性相关性,但组内相关系数显示一致性较差。iGFR估计值之间的相似性检验显示GFR平均值之间存在差异。因此,在癌症患者GFR评估中,iGFR测定仍是首选方法。在我们的研究人群中,血清CysC检测是测量肾小球功能最可靠的替代方法。