Thoracic outlet syndrome. Thoracic surgery perspective.

We have attempted throughout this review to identify the issues surrounding thoracic outlet syndrome as well as to highlight their origins. It should be clear that many aspects of TOS remain controversial from the definition of the entity through pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. The conflicts surrounding TOS are underlined most poignantly in the many letters to the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine in response to Urschel's 1972 publication. It is incumbent upon those of us who treat patients with TOS to dispel the ignorance surrounding this syndrome with astute, accurate, and reproducible observations. We must clearly define TOS as a clinical entity such that we may analyze the characteristics of the patients we treat. We must continue to search for innovative and specific diagnostic criteria. We must quantitatively and reproducibly measure subjective end points of pain severity and quality of life. The use of these methods will provide yardsticks for therapeutic success and act as determinants for the natural history of TOS. The objectives of treatment will remain the alleviation of symptoms and the restoration of function. We have applied these principles to the formulation of a protocol in which we record, in a prospective manner, both routine and innovative clinical parameters. With quantification of subjective end points, we may be able to correlate clinical presentation with outcome. We also may be able to define with some accuracy this entity we call thoracic outlet syndrome.