Ortorp Anders, Jemt Torsten
The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Sep;10(3):128-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00073.x. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
Comparative long-term knowledge of different framework materials in the partially edentulous implant patient is not available.
To report and compare 10-year data on free-standing implant-supported partial prostheses with laser-welded titanium (test) and conventional gold alloy (control) frameworks.
Altogether, 52 partially edentulous patients were consecutively provided with laser-welded prostheses (n = 60) in the partially edentulous lower jaw (test group). A control group of 52 randomly selected patients with gold alloy castings (n = 60) was used for comparison. Clinical and radiographic 10-year data were retrospectively collected and evaluated for both groups.
The overall 10-year implant cumulative survival rate (CSR) was 93.0% (loaded implants, 96.4%), with a 10-year implant CSR of 91.5 and 94.7% for test and control implants, respectively (p > .05). Out of a total of 22 lost implants, 17 implants (77.3%) were shorter than 10 mm. The overall 10-year prosthesis CSR was 93.7%, with a corresponding 10-year CSR of 88.4 and 100% for test and control groups, respectively (p < .05). Average 10-year bone loss was 0.46 mm (SD 0.47) and 0.69 mm (SD 0.53) for the test and control groups (p < .001), respectively. Only 1% of the implants had >3 mm accumulated bone loss after 10 years. Altogether, 10 of the prostheses in both groups had implant component mechanical problems (8.3%). None of the frameworks or implants fractured, but more fractures of porcelain veneers were observed in the test group (p < .05).
The protocol of implant treatment in the partially edentulous jaw functioned well during 10 years, although prosthodontic maintenance was required. However, laser-welded titanium frameworks presented more problems as compared with gold alloy frameworks. More loaded implants were lost (p < .05), and higher incidence of porcelain chipping was noted in the test group (p < .05). However, bone loss was on an average lower for the test group during the 10 years of follow-up (p < .001).
目前尚无关于部分牙列缺损种植患者使用不同基托材料的长期对比数据。
报告并比较采用激光焊接钛基托(试验组)和传统金合金基托(对照组)的独立种植支持式局部义齿的10年数据。
共有52例部分牙列缺损患者在下颌部分牙列缺损区连续接受激光焊接义齿修复(n = 60)(试验组)。选取52例随机选择的使用金合金铸件修复的患者(n = 60)作为对照组进行比较。对两组患者回顾性收集并评估其临床和影像学10年数据。
10年种植体总体累积留存率(CSR)为93.0%(负重种植体,96.4%),试验组和对照组种植体的10年CSR分别为91.5%和94.7%(p >.05)。在总共22颗丢失的种植体中,17颗种植体(77.3%)长度短于10 mm。10年义齿总体CSR为93.7%,试验组和对照组相应的10年CSR分别为88.4%和100%(p <.05)。试验组和对照组10年平均骨吸收分别为0.46 mm(标准差0.47)和0.69 mm(标准差0.53)(p <.001)。10年后仅1%的种植体累积骨吸收超过3 mm。两组共有10副义齿出现种植体部件机械问题(8.3%)。基托或种植体均未发生折断,但试验组观察到更多的瓷贴面折断(p <.05)。
部分牙列缺损颌骨的种植治疗方案在10年期间效果良好,尽管需要进行口腔修复维护。然而,与金合金基托相比,激光焊接钛基托出现的问题更多。试验组有更多负重种植体丢失(p <.05),且瓷崩裂发生率更高(p <.05)。然而,试验组在10年随访期间平均骨吸收较低(p <.001)。