Jemt Torsten, Bergendal Birgitta, Arvidson Kristina, Bergendal Tord, Karlsson L D S d Ulf, Linden Bengt, Rundcrantz Torgil, Wendelhag Inger
Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health, Göteborg, Sweden.
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Nov-Dec;15(6):544-8.
This study evaluated the 5-year clinical and radiographic performance of fixed implant-supported maxillary prostheses with either welded titanium or conventional cast-gold alloy frameworks.
Fifty-eight consecutive patients were provided with 349 osseointegrated Brånemark system implants in the edentulous maxilla at six different implant centers. Twenty-eight of the patients received, at random, prostheses with laser-welded titanium frameworks, and the remaining 30 patients had prostheses with conventional cast-gold alloy frameworks. Clinical and radiographic data were collected for 5 years after prosthesis placement.
The titanium and cast-gold framework groups exhibited similar cumulative survival and success rates (CSR). The 5-year implant CSR from time of placement was 91.4% and 94.0%, respectively, and from prosthesis delivery the rate was 94.9% and 95.6%, respectively. The corresponding 5-year prosthesis CSRs were 96.4% and 93.3%. One patient from each group lost all the implants and turned to complete dentures within the first year of function. Another patient with a cast-gold framework had the prosthesis replaced after 4 years, basically because of problems with the veneering material. No fractures of implant components were observed during the follow-up period. Bone loss was on average 0.59 mm (SD 0.97 mm) during 5 years, with no statistical difference between the two groups.
Welded titanium frameworks presented a similar favorable clinical performance as conventional cast-gold alloy frameworks in fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla after 5 years in function. Implant failures were concentrated in only a few patients in each study group.
本研究评估了采用焊接钛框架或传统铸造金合金框架的固定种植体支持上颌修复体的5年临床和影像学表现。
在六个不同的种植中心,为58例连续患者的无牙上颌植入了349颗骨结合式Brånemark系统种植体。其中28例患者随机接受了激光焊接钛框架的修复体,其余30例患者的修复体采用传统铸造金合金框架。在修复体植入后收集5年的临床和影像学数据。
钛框架组和铸造金合金框架组的累积生存率和成功率(CSR)相似。从种植体植入时起计算的5年种植体CSR分别为91.4%和94.0%,从修复体交付时起计算的比率分别为94.9%和95.6%。相应的5年修复体CSR分别为96.4%和93.3%。每组各有1例患者在功能的第一年内失去了所有种植体并改用全口义齿。另1例采用铸造金合金框架的患者在4年后更换了修复体,主要是因为饰面材料出现问题。在随访期间未观察到种植体部件骨折。5年内平均骨吸收为0.59 mm(标准差0.97 mm),两组之间无统计学差异。
在无牙上颌的固定种植体支持修复体中,经过5年的功能使用,焊接钛框架与传统铸造金合金框架呈现出相似的良好临床表现。每个研究组中仅有少数患者出现种植体失败。